Przejdź do zawartości
Merck

Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP (2015-06-07)
Hayato Nishida, Morihiko Hirota, Yoshiki Seto, Gen Suzuki, Masashi Kato, Masato Kitagaki, Mariko Sugiyama, Hirokazu Kouzuki, Satomi Onoue
ABSTRAKT

Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50 μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50 μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.

MATERIAŁY
Numer produktu
Marka
Opis produktu

Sigma-Aldrich
3-(4-Methylbenzylidene)camphor, ≥98.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, meets EP testing specifications, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, sterile-filtered, BioPerformance Certified, meets EP, USP testing specifications, suitable for hybridoma
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecanoic acid, ≥99% (GC/titration)
Sigma-Aldrich
Quinine, suitable for fluorescence, anhydrous, ≥98.0% (dried material, NT)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
1,2-Propanediol, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium dodecyl sulfate solution, BioUltra, for molecular biology, 20% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, BioReagent, for molecular biology, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, Hybri-Max, sterile-filtered, BioReagent, suitable for hybridoma, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, for molecular biology
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, ≥99.5% (GC), suitable for plant cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
DL-Lactic acid, 85 % (w/w), syrup
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, for molecular biology, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for electrophoresis, ≥99% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
5α-Androstan-17β-ol-3-one, ≥97.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
1,2-Propanediol, meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, USP, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acridine, BioReagent, suitable for fluorescence, ≥97.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
6-Methylcoumarin, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
8-Octanoyloxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt, suitable for fluorescence, ≥90% (HPCE)
Sigma-Aldrich
Quinine, 90%
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethyl-4-nitrosoaniline, ≥97%
Sigma-Aldrich
5α-Androstan-17β-ol-3-one, purum, ≥99.0% (TLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
1,2-Propanediol, ReagentPlus®, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acridine, ≥96.5% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, electronic grade, 99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
6-Methylcoumarin, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
3,4,4′-Trichlorocarbanilide, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, FCC, FG