Skip to Content
Merck
  • Effect of a negative energy balance induced by feed restriction in lactating sows on hepatic lipid metabolism, milk production and development of litters.

Effect of a negative energy balance induced by feed restriction in lactating sows on hepatic lipid metabolism, milk production and development of litters.

Archives of animal nutrition (2015-08-26)
Denise K Gessner, Birthe Gröne, Susann Rosenbaum, Erika Most, Sonja Hillen, Sabrina Becker, Georg Erhardt, Gerald Reiner, Robert Ringseis, Klaus Eder
ABSTRACT

In rodents, forced activation of hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) by administration of exogenous PPARα activators during lactation leads to a reduction of milk triacylglycerol (TAG) production. Herein, we investigated whether a negative energy balance (NEB) induced by feed restriction (about 18% lower feed and energy intake) during lactation by increasing the release of fatty acids, which act as PPARα agonists, causes a disruption of hepatic lipid metabolism and thereby impairs milk TAG production in sows. Nutrient and energy content of the milk on day 20 of lactation and gains of litters during the first 14 d and the whole 21 d suckling period did not differ between Control and feed-restricted sows. The mRNA concentrations of several sterol regulatory element-binding protein target genes involved in lipid synthesis in the liver and the plasma concentration of TAG were reduced in the feed-restricted sows, whereas the mRNA concentrations of PPARα target genes involved in fatty acid oxidation in liver and skeletal muscle were not different between groups. In conclusion, it was shown that an NEB during lactation does not adversely affect milk composition and gains of litters, despite inhibiting hepatic expression of genes involved in lipid synthesis and reducing plasma TAG concentration. The finding that PPARα target genes involved in fatty acid utilisation in liver and muscle of sows are not induced by the NEB during lactation may explain that fatty acid availability in the mammary gland is sufficient to maintain milk TAG production and to allow normal litter gain.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen chloride solution, 3 M in cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 32 wt. % in H2O, FCC
Sigma-Aldrich
SyntheChol® NS0 Supplement, 500 ×, synthetic cholesterol, animal component-free, aqueous solution, sterile-filtered, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, from lanolin, ≥99.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, Sigma Grade, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, from sheep wool, ≥92.5% (GC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid, 36.5-38.0%, BioReagent, for molecular biology
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, ~6 M in H2O, for amino acid analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 1.0 N, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Supelco
Hydrochloric acid solution, volumetric, 0.1 M HCl (0.1N), endotoxin free
SAFC
Cholesterol, from sheep wool, Controlled origin, meets USP/NF testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Carnitine-(methyl-d3) hydrochloride, 98 atom % D, 98% (CP)
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Lysine monohydrochloride, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (AT)
SAFC
Cholesterol, Plant-Derived, SyntheChol®
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen chloride, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Lysine monohydrochloride, from non-animal source, meets EP, JP, USP testing specifications, suitable for cell culture, 98.5-101.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Lysine monohydrochloride, reagent grade, ≥98% (HPLC)