跳轉至內容
Merck
  • Validation of a P-Glycoprotein (P-gp) Humanized Mouse Model by Integrating Selective Absolute Quantification of Human MDR1, Mouse Mdr1a and Mdr1b Protein Expressions with In Vivo Functional Analysis for Blood-Brain Barrier Transport.

Validation of a P-Glycoprotein (P-gp) Humanized Mouse Model by Integrating Selective Absolute Quantification of Human MDR1, Mouse Mdr1a and Mdr1b Protein Expressions with In Vivo Functional Analysis for Blood-Brain Barrier Transport.

PloS one (2015-05-02)
Muhammad Waqas Sadiq, Yasuo Uchida, Yutaro Hoshi, Masanori Tachikawa, Tetsuya Terasaki, Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes
摘要

It is essential to establish a useful validation method for newly generated humanized mouse models. The novel approach of combining our established species-specific protein quantification method combined with in vivo functional studies is evaluated to validate a humanized mouse model of P-gp/MDR1 efflux transporter. The P-gp substrates digoxin, verapamil and docetaxel were administered to male FVB Mdr1a/1b(+/+) (FVB WT), FVB Mdr1a/1b(-/-) (Mdr1a/1b(-/-)), C57BL/6 Mdr1a/1b(+/+) (C57BL/6 WT) and humanized C57BL (hMDR1) mice. Brain-to-plasma total concentration ratios (Kp) were measured. Quantitative targeted absolute proteomic (QTAP) analysis was used to selectively quantify the protein expression levels of hMDR1, Mdr1a and Mdr1b in the isolated brain capillaries. The protein expressions of other transporters, receptors and claudin-5 were also quantified. The Kp for digoxin, verapamil, and docetaxel were 20, 30 and 4 times higher in the Mdr1a/1b(-/-) mice than in the FVB WT controls, as expected. The Kp for digoxin, verapamil and docetaxel were 2, 16 and 2-times higher in the hMDR1 compared to the C57BL/6 WT mice. The hMDR1 mice had 63- and 9.1-fold lower expressions of the hMDR1 and Mdr1a proteins than the corresponding expression of Mdr1a in C57BL/6 WT mice, respectively. The protein expression levels of other molecules were almost consistent between C57BL/6 WT and hMDR1 mice. The P-gp function at the BBB in the hMDR1 mice was smaller than that in WT mice due to lower protein expression levels of hMDR1 and Mdr1a. The combination of QTAP and in vivo functional analyses was successfully applied to validate the humanized animal model and evaluates its suitability for further studies.

材料
產品編號
品牌
產品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, for molecular biology, DNase, RNase, and protease, none detected, ≥99% (titration)
Sigma-Aldrich
盐酸 溶液, 1.0 N, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化镁, anhydrous, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钙 溶液, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ~1 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化镁 溶液, for molecular biology, 1.00 M±0.01 M
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠 溶液, 5 M in H2O, BioReagent, for molecular biology, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠 溶液, 0.9% in water, BioXtra, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
盐酸, 36.5-38.0%, BioReagent, for molecular biology
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钙, anhydrous, BioReagent, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥96.0%
Supelco
盐酸 溶液, volumetric, 0.1 M HCl (0.1N), endotoxin free
SAFC
氯化钠 溶液, 5 M
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化镁, powder, <200 μm
Sigma-Aldrich
甲醇, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠 溶液, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ~5 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
氨, anhydrous, ≥99.98%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, 99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钙, anhydrous, powder, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99.5% (AT)
Sigma-Aldrich
氨 溶液, 4 M in methanol
Sigma-Aldrich
乙酸, for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化氢, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化镁 溶液, BioUltra, for molecular biology, 2 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, BioXtra, ≥99.5% (AT)
Sigma-Aldrich
(±)-维拉帕米 盐酸盐, ≥99% (titration), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化镁, BioReagent, suitable for insect cell culture, ≥97.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
氨 溶液, 0.4 M in THF
Sigma-Aldrich
乙酸, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
盐酸 溶液, ~6 M in H2O, for amino acid analysis