GF19020620
Tin
rod, 500mm, diameter 3.0mm, 99.99+%
Synonym(s):
Tin, SN007918
Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing
All Photos(2)
Select a Size
Change View
1 EA
€457.00
About This Item
Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
Sn
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
118.71
MDL number:
UNSPSC Code:
12141745
PubChem Substance ID:
NACRES:
NA.23
Recommended Products
Assay
99.99%
form
rod
manufacturer/tradename
Goodfellow 190-206-20
resistivity
11 μΩ-cm, 20°C
L × diam.
500 mm × 3.0 mm
bp
2270 °C (lit.)
mp
231.9 °C (lit.)
density
7.310 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.)
SMILES string
[Sn]
InChI
1S/Sn
InChI key
ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N
General description
For updated SDS information please visit www.goodfellow.com.
Legal Information
Product of Goodfellow
Choose from one of the most recent versions:
Certificates of Analysis (COA)
Lot/Batch Number
It looks like we've run into a problem, but you can still download Certificates of Analysis from our Documents section.
If you need assistance, please contact Customer Support.
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
The newer essential trace elements, chromium, tin, nickel, vanadium and silicon.
W Mertz
The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 33(3), 307-313 (1974-12-01)
[Tin in the environment].
Iu P Popov et al.
Gigiena i sanitariia, (9)(9), 55-57 (1983-09-01)
K A Winship
Adverse drug reactions and acute poisoning reviews, 7(1), 19-38 (1988-01-01)
Inorganic tin salts are poorly absorbed and rapidly excreted in the faeces; as a result they have a low toxicity. Only about 5 per cent is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, widely distributed in the body, then excreted by the
S G Schäfer et al.
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 4(1), 57-69 (1984-03-01)
A tolerable limit for tin concentration in canned food of 250 ppm (Fritsch et al., 1977) is generally accepted. However, biochemical effects attributable to tin have been observed even after oral administration of 1 and 3 mg Sn/kg body wt
Gabriel Santpere et al.
Genome biology and evolution, 7(6), 1490-1505 (2015-05-16)
We set out to investigate potential differences and similarities between the selective forces acting upon the coding and noncoding regions of five different sets of genes defined according to functional and evolutionary criteria: 1) two reference gene sets presenting accelerated
Active Filters
Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.
Contact Technical Service
