Pular para o conteúdo
Merck
  • Is there a beneficial effect of the calcium channel blocker diltiazem on cyclosporine A nephrotoxicity in rats?

Is there a beneficial effect of the calcium channel blocker diltiazem on cyclosporine A nephrotoxicity in rats?

Experimental and toxicologic pathology : official journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie (1998-10-23)
U D Kuhn, A Lupp, E Kostka, A Kühl, A Balogh, G Stein, C Fleck
RESUMO

To investigate whether or not there is a beneficial effect of diltiazem (D) on cyclosporine A (CsA) nephrotoxicity, renal function, CsA blood levels, and effects of CsA on biotransformation in the liver and on lipid peroxidation were characterized in rats. A single administration of D (60 mg/kg b.wt.) reduced urinary volume (UV), GFR and excretion of Na+ and K+, whereas a single dose of CsA (60 mg/kg b.wt.) alone had no respective effects. P-aminohippurate excretion was almost equal in all groups. Lower doses of D (and CsA) were without effects. After repeated CsA treatment a retardation in body weight gain was seen, with little effect of a co-administration with D hereon. In all tests, thymus mass was reduced by CsA, the weight of spleen, liver, adrenal glands, and kidney were not generally affected by any of the treatments. Furthermore, after repeated administration of CsA and/or D, urinary volume, GFR and Na+ excretion were reduced by CsA, too. Electrolyte concentrations in plasma showed no evident changes by any of the treatments for Na+ and Ca2+. After long time treatment, CsA and CsA + D quite similarly led to higher K+ but lower Mg2+ concentrations in plasma. Only with 7 days highest dosage treatment PAH excretion was reduced significantly by CsA and CsA + D treatment. Surprisingly, CsA levels measured in blood and in kidney tissue, showed lower values after co-administration with D compared to CsA treatment alone. This could be caused by higher activities of monooxygenase functions revealed after pretreatment with D alone. Reduced glutathione (GSH) contents in kidney were elevated in CsA and CsA + D treated groups. In general no significant differences were to be observed concerning lipid peroxidation and stimulated H2O2 formation. Altogether evident protective effects of diltiazem on CsA nephrotoxicity in rats could not be proven.