Skip to Content
Merck
  • A novel toxicogenomics-based approach to categorize (non-)genotoxic carcinogens.

A novel toxicogenomics-based approach to categorize (non-)genotoxic carcinogens.

Archives of toxicology (2014-10-02)
Mirjam M Schaap, Paul F K Wackers, Edwin P Zwart, Ilse Huijskens, Martijs J Jonker, Giel Hendriks, Timo M Breit, Harry van Steeg, Bob van de Water, Mirjam Luijten
ABSTRACT

Alternative methods to detect non-genotoxic carcinogens are urgently needed, as this class of carcinogens goes undetected in the current testing strategy for carcinogenicity under REACH. A complicating factor is that non-genotoxic carcinogens act through several distinctive modes of action, which makes prediction of their carcinogenic property difficult. We have recently demonstrated that gene expression profiling in primary mouse hepatocytes is a useful approach to categorize non-genotoxic carcinogens according to their modes of action. In the current study, we improved the methods used for analysis and added mouse embryonic stem cells as a second in vitro test system, because of their features complementary to hepatocytes. Our approach involved an unsupervised analysis based on the 30 most significantly up- and down-regulated genes per chemical. Mouse embryonic stem cells and primary mouse hepatocytes were exposed to a selected set of chemicals and subsequently subjected to gene expression profiling. We focused on non-genotoxic carcinogens, but also included genotoxic carcinogens and non-carcinogens to test the robustness of this approach. Application of the optimized comparison approach resulted in improved categorization of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Mouse embryonic stem cells were a useful addition, especially for genotoxic substances, but also for detection of non-genotoxic carcinogens that went undetected by primary hepatocytes. The approach presented here is an important step forward to categorize chemicals, especially those that are carcinogenic.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
FK-506 monohydrate, ≥98% (HPLC)
Supelco
Phenobarbital solution, 1 mg/mL in methanol, ampule of 1 mL, certified reference material, Cerilliant®
Sigma-Aldrich
Cyclosporin A, 97.0-101.5% (on dried basis)
Sigma-Aldrich
cis-Diamineplatinum(II) dichloride, ≥99.9% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Diethyl maleate, 97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Bis(tributyltin) oxide, 96%
Sigma-Aldrich
Magnesium methyl carbonate solution, 2.0 M in DMF
Sigma-Aldrich
Carbon tetrachloride, anhydrous, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Diethyl maleate, ≥96%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Trichloroethylene, anhydrous, contains 40 ppm diisopropylamine as stabilizer, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
D-Mannitol, BioUltra, ≥99.0% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Cyclosporin A, from Tolypocladium inflatum, ≥95% (HPLC), solid
Sigma-Aldrich
Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, ≥97.5% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
D-Mannitol, meets EP, FCC, USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
D-Mannitol, ACS reagent
Sigma-Aldrich
D-Mannitol, ≥98% (GC), suitable for plant cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
D-Mannitol, ≥98% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
D-Mannitol, BioXtra, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
TCPOBOP, ≥98% (HPLC), solid
Sigma-Aldrich
Okadaic acid from Prorocentrum concavum, 92-100% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Trichloroethylene, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Trichloroethylene, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Diethoxymethane, 99.7%, contains 50-150 ppm BHT as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Trichloroethylene, puriss. p.a., ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Carbon tetrachloride, reagent grade, 99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide solution, 50 wt. % in H2O
Supelco
1,1,1-Trichloroethane solution, certified reference material, 5000 μg/mL in methanol
Sigma-Aldrich
Mitomycin C from Streptomyces caespitosus, meets USP testing specifications
Supelco
Aroclor 1254 solution, certified reference material, 1000 μg/mL in methanol