Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Comparability of higher order structure in proteins: chemometric analysis of second-derivative amide I Fourier transform infrared spectra.

Comparability of higher order structure in proteins: chemometric analysis of second-derivative amide I Fourier transform infrared spectra.

Journal of pharmaceutical sciences (2014-11-11)
Gregory Stockdale, Brian M Murphy, Jennifer D'Antonio, Mark Cornell Manning, Wasfi Al-Azzam
ABSTRACT

Comparing higher order structure (HOS) in therapeutic proteins is a significant challenge. Previously, we showed that changes in solution conditions produced detectable changes in the second-derivative amide I Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra for a variety of model proteins. Those comparisons utilized vector-based approaches, such as spectral overlap and spectral correlation coefficients to quantify differences between spectra. In this study, chemometric analyses of the same data were performed, to classify samples into different groups based on the solution conditions received. The solution conditions were composed of various combinations of temperature, pH, and salt types. At first, principal component analysis (PCA) was used to visually demonstrate that FTIR spectra respond to changes in solution conditions, which, presumably indicates variations in HOS. This observed when samples from the same solution condition form clusters within a PCA score plot. The second approach, called soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA), was conducted to account for the within-class experimental error for the lysozyme spectra. The DModX values, indicative of the distance of each spectra to their respective class models, was found to be a more sensitive quantitative indicator of changes in HOS, when compared with the modified area of overlap algorithm. The SIMCA approach provides a metric to determine whether new observations do, or do not belong to a particular class or group. Thus, SIMCA is the recommended approach when multiple samples from each condition are available.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 1 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 0.1 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycine, SAJ special grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 4 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, 99.5-100.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 6 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 7 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 6 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, JIS special grade, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 12 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid solution, 1 M, 1 N
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 0.2 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 0.05 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 0.01 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 1 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 0.05 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid, SAJ first grade, 35.0-37.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 0.02 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen chloride solution, 3 M in cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)
Supelco
Sodium hydroxide concentrate, 0.1 M NaOH in water (0.1N), Eluent concentrate for IC
Supelco
Glycine, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycine, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 32 wt. % in H2O, FCC
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, BioUltra, for luminescence, ≥98.0% (T), pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, BioUltra, for molecular biology, 10 M in H2O
Supelco
Hydrogen chloride – ethanol solution, ~1.25 M HCl, for GC derivatization, LiChropur
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)