Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Meta-analysis of cilostazol versus aspirin for the secondary prevention of stroke.

Meta-analysis of cilostazol versus aspirin for the secondary prevention of stroke.

The American journal of cardiology (2013-07-06)
James J Dinicolantonio, Carl J Lavie, Hassan Fares, Arthur R Menezes, James H O'Keefe, Sripal Bangalore, Franz H Messerli
ABSTRACT

Aspirin is the most widely prescribed antiplatelet agent for the secondary prevention of stroke. Cilostazol, an antiplatelet and vasodilating agent, has shown promise for the secondary prevention of stroke. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Excerpta Medica (EMBASE) was searched up to October 2012. Four trials, in 3,917 patients, comparing cilostazol with aspirin were identified. Compared with aspirin, cilostazol was associated with a 73% reduction in hemorrhagic stroke (relative risk [RR] 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13 to 0.54, p = 0.0002), 28% reduction in the composite end point of stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89, p = 0.003), and 48% reduction in total hemorrhagic events (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.79, p = 0.002), with trend for lesser gastrointestinal bleeds (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.06, p = 0.08). In conclusion, compared with aspirin, cilostazol is associated with significantly less hemorrhagic stroke, the combined end point of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death, and total hemorrhagic events, with numerically fewer gastrointestinal bleeds when used for the secondary prevention of stroke.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Cilostazol, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
USP
Cilostazol, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard