The material in question is not "fused" silica and can be characterized as amorphous. Unlike fused silica, which is made at very high temperatures exceeding 1000°C to densify and crystallize it, the material is based on the Stober process and does not undergo temperatures greater than 150°C. This amorphous versus crystalline distinction could account for the difference in refractive index.
904376
Silica
monodisperse, non-porous, 20 μm
Synonym(s):
Monodisperse silicon dioxide, Non-porous silica, Non-porous silicon dioxide, Silica, Silicon dioxide
About This Item
Recommended Products
form
powder
bp
2230 °C (lit.)
mp
>1600 °C (lit.)
SMILES string
O=[Si]=O
InChI
1S/O2Si/c1-3-2
InChI key
VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Looking for similar products? Visit Product Comparison Guide
Related Categories
Application
Storage Class Code
11 - Combustible Solids
WGK
nwg
Flash Point(F)
Not applicable
Flash Point(C)
Not applicable
Choose from one of the most recent versions:
Certificates of Analysis (COA)
Don't see the Right Version?
If you require a particular version, you can look up a specific certificate by the Lot or Batch number.
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
Customers Also Viewed
-
Could you please confirm if 904376-2G is made of fused silica? It was found that the refractive index of the microspheres is lower than the expected value for fused silica by about 0.023. For instance, at 1100nm, the measured refractive index is 1.426, while the value for fused silica is expected to be 1.449. If it is indeed fused silica, is there a reason why the refractive index is lower than the expected value?
1 answer-
Helpful?
-
Active Filters
Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.
Contact Technical Service