跳轉至內容
Merck
  • Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.

Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.

The international journal of esthetic dentistry (2014-04-24)
Abdulaziz M Altamimi, Aris Petros Tripodakis, George Eliades, Hiroshi Hirayama
摘要

To compare the fracture resistance between bilayered zirconia/ fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate heat-pressed crowns and characterize the mode of fracture failure. Thirty crown samples were sequentially fitted on a mandibular right first molar metal replica of an ivory prepared molar tooth. The crown specimens were divided in three groups (A, B, and C; n = 10 for each group). Group A consisted of bilayered zirconia/fluorhapatite pressed-over crowns with standard design crown copings (0.7 mm uniform thickness), Group B of bilayered zirconia/fluorhapatite with anatomical design crown copings, and Group C of lithium disilicate monolithic crowns. The samples were then dynamically loaded under water for 100,000 cycles with a profile of 250 N maximum load at 1,000 N/s rate and 2.0 Hz frequency. Loading was performed with a steel ball (5 mm in diameter) coming into contact with the test crown, loading to maximum, holding for 0.2 s, unloading and lifting off 0.5 mm. The samples were then fractured under static loading, in order to determine the ultimate crown strength. Analysis of the recorded fracture load values was carried out with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey tests. Fractured specimens were examined by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The fracture loads measured were (N, means and standard deviations): Group A: 561.87 (72.63), Group B: 1,014.16 (70.18) and Group C: 1,360.63 (77.95). All mean differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Catastrophic fractures occurred in Group C, whereas mainly veneer fractures were observed in Groups A and B. In the present study, the heat-pressed monolithic lithium-disilicate crowns showed more fracture resistance than zirconia/fluorapatite pressed-over crowns. Within the bilayered groups, the anatomical zirconia coping design presented increased ceramic fracture resistance.

材料
產品編號
品牌
產品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
水, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
水, Nuclease-Free Water, for Molecular Biology
Sigma-Aldrich
水, sterile-filtered, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
水, HPLC Plus
Sigma-Aldrich
水, Deionized
Sigma-Aldrich
水, for embryo transfer, sterile-filtered, BioXtra, suitable for mouse embryo cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
水, for molecular biology, sterile filtered
Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆(IV), powder, 5 μm, 99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
水, BioPerformance Certified
Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆(IV), nanopowder, <100 nm particle size (TEM)
Sigma-Aldrich
水, ACS reagent
Sigma-Aldrich
水, for cell biology, sterile ultrafiltered
Sigma-Aldrich
锆, powder, −100 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
水, PCR Reagent
Supelco
水, suitable for ion chromatography
Sigma-Aldrich
低氘水, ≤1 ppm (Deuterium oxide)
Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆(IV), 99.99% trace metals basis (purity excludes ~2% HfO2)
Sigma-Aldrich
水-16O, ≥99.94 atom % 16O
Sigma-Aldrich
锆, foil, thickness 0.1 mm, 99.98% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
E-Toxate 水, endotoxin, free
Sigma-Aldrich
锆, sponge, ≥99% trace metals basis
Supelco
水, for TOC analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
锆, rod, diam. 6.35 mm, ≥99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆(IV), nanoparticles, dispersion, <100 nm particle size (BET), 10 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆(IV), nanoparticles, dispersion, <100 nm particle size (BET), 5 wt. % in H2O
Supelco
水, ACS reagent, for ultratrace analysis
纯水密度标准物质RM, 0.9982 g/mL(20 °C), UKAS ISO/IEC17025 and ISO Guide 34 certified, density: 0.9982 g/mL at 20 °C, density: 0.9970 g/mL at 25 °C
Sigma-Aldrich
水, tested according to Ph. Eur.
水, UKAS ISO/IEC17025 and ISO Guide 34 certified, density: 0.9982 g/mL at 20 °C, density: 0.9970 g/mL at 25 °C
Supelco
密度标准品 998kg/m3, H&D Fitzgerald Ltd. Quality