All Photos(1)
About This Item
CAS Number:
FEMA Number:
2116
EC Number:
Council of Europe no.:
298n
MDL number:
UNSPSC Code:
12164502
NACRES:
NA.21
Recommended Products
grade
Kosher
Quality Level
refractive index
n20/D 1.5690 (lit.)
density
1.161 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.)
application(s)
flavors and fragrances
Documentation
see Safety & Documentation for available documents
food allergen
no known allergens
Organoleptic
balsamic; woody; sweet; vanilla
Looking for similar products? Visit Product Comparison Guide
Biochem/physiol Actions
Taste at 10 ppm
Disclaimer
For R&D or non-EU Food use. Not for retail sale.
Signal Word
Warning
Hazard Statements
Hazard Classifications
Skin Irrit. 2
Storage Class Code
10 - Combustible liquids
WGK
WGK 2
Flash Point(F)
Not applicable
Flash Point(C)
Not applicable
Personal Protective Equipment
dust mask type N95 (US), Eyeshields, Gloves
Certificates of Analysis (COA)
Search for Certificates of Analysis (COA) by entering the products Lot/Batch Number. Lot and Batch Numbers can be found on a product’s label following the words ‘Lot’ or ‘Batch’.
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
Stephanie Tan et al.
The Australasian journal of dermatology, 52(3), 222-223 (2011-08-13)
Two patients presented with cheilitis and perioral dermatitis. Patch testing revealed positive reactions to both Myroxylon pereirae (MP; formerly known as Balsam of Peru) and Lucas Papaw Ointment (LPO; Lucas Papaw Remedies, Bisbane, Qld, Australia). MP was not listed as
J P Thyssen et al.
The British journal of dermatology, 161(1), 95-101 (2009-05-15)
The prevalence of sensitization to fragrance mix (FM) I and Myroxylon pereirae (MP, balsam of Peru) has decreased in recent years among Danish women with dermatitis. This study investigated whether the decrease could be confirmed among women in the general
Rajiv I Nijhawan et al.
Dermatologic clinics, 27(3), 355-364 (2009-07-08)
Systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) describes a cutaneous eruption in response to systemic exposure to an allergen. The exact pathologic mechanism remains uncertain. The broad spectrum of presentations that are often nonspecific can make it difficult for the clinician to suspect
Patch testing: the whole in addition to the sum of its parts is greatest.
Rajiv I Nijhawan et al.
Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug, 20(1), 58-59 (2009-03-27)
Elise M Herro et al.
Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug, 23(1), 17-21 (2012-06-02)
Although allergic contact dermatitis of the eyelids is a common condition, limited information is available regarding the selection of patch-testing chemicals for proper evaluation. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the relevance of allergens responsible for allergic eyelid
Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.
Contact Technical Service