699624
Carbon, mesoporous
nanopowder, graphitized, less than 250 ppm Al, Ti, Fe, Ni, Cu, and Zn combined
Synonym(s):
Graphite nanoparticles, Graphitized carbon, Graphitized carbon black
Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing
All Photos(4)
About This Item
Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
C
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
12.01
EC Number:
MDL number:
UNSPSC Code:
12352302
PubChem Substance ID:
NACRES:
NA.23
Recommended Products
Quality Level
form
nanopowder
surface area
50-100 m2/g
pore size
0.25 cm3/g pore volume (typical)
137 Å average pore diameter (typical)
bp
4827 °C
mp
3654-3697 °C
density
1.828 g/cm3 (absolute, typical)
bulk density
0.075 g/cm3
SMILES string
[C]
InChI
1S/C
InChI key
OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Looking for similar products? Visit Product Comparison Guide
General description
Surface area of the graphitized mesoporous carbon was determined to be 77 m2/g. These are highly pure graphitized, porous carbon nanoparticles. Particles have large mesopores and some microporosity. Graphite lattice structure content of approximately 10%. An agglomeration of 30 nm mesoporous nanoparticles (TEM).
Application
The cytotoxic effects of graphitized carbon mesoporous nanopowder and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) was compared on human airway epithelium. Mesoporous carbon was found to have no effect on the epithelium cell morphology.
Storage Class Code
11 - Combustible Solids
WGK
nwg
Flash Point(F)
Not applicable
Flash Point(C)
Not applicable
Personal Protective Equipment
dust mask type N95 (US), Eyeshields, Gloves
Choose from one of the most recent versions:
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
Customers Also Viewed
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes induce altered
morphology and loss of barrier function in human
bronchial epithelium at noncytotoxic doses
morphology and loss of barrier function in human
bronchial epithelium at noncytotoxic doses
Snyder RJ, et al.
Nanomedicine (London, England), 9, 4093-4105 (2014)
Tegan N Lavoie et al.
Environmental science & technology, 49(13), 7904-7913 (2015-07-08)
We report measurements of methane (CH4) emission rates observed at eight different high-emitting point sources in the Barnett Shale, Texas, using aircraft-based methods performed as part of the Barnett Coordinated Campaign. We quantified CH4 emission rates from four gas processing
Catharina Vendl et al.
The Journal of experimental biology, 218(Pt 21), 3425-3434 (2015-11-06)
Fundamental differences in methane (CH4) production between macropods (kangaroos) and ruminants have been suggested and linked to differences in the composition of the forestomach microbiome. Using six western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) and four red kangaroos (Macropus rufus), we measured
Garvin A Heath et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(31), E3167-E3176 (2014-07-23)
Recent technological advances in the recovery of unconventional natural gas, particularly shale gas, have served to dramatically increase domestic production and reserve estimates for the United States and internationally. This trend has led to lowered prices and increased scrutiny on
Antoine P Pagé et al.
PloS one, 10(7), e0132062-e0132062 (2015-07-15)
The objectives of this study were to uncover Salix purpurea-microbe xenobiotic degradation systems that could be harnessed in rhizoremediation, and to identify microorganisms that are likely involved in these partnerships. To do so, we tested S. purpurea's ability to stimulate
Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.
Contact Technical Service