Skip to Content
Merck
All Photos(2)

Documents

GF73523842

Lead

foil, 100x100mm, thickness 1.0mm, as rolled, 99.5%

Synonym(s):

Lead, PB000413

Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing
All Photos(2)

About This Item

Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
Pb
CAS Number:
7439-92-1
Molecular Weight:
207.20
MDL number:
MFCD00134050
UNSPSC Code:
12141723
PubChem Substance ID:
329811019
NACRES:
NA.23

Assay

99.5%

form

foil

manufacturer/tradename

Goodfellow 735-238-42

resistivity

20.65 μΩ-cm

size × thickness

100x100 mm × 1.0 mm

bp

1740 °C (lit.)

mp

327.4 °C (lit.)

SMILES string

[Pb]

InChI

1S/Pb

InChI key

WABPQHHGFIMREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N

General description

For updated SDS information please visit www.goodfellow.com.

Legal Information

Product of Goodfellow

Pictograms

Health hazardEnvironment
GHS08,GHS09

Signal Word

Danger

Hazard Statements

H360FD,H362,H372,H410

Hazard Classifications

Aquatic Acute 1 - Aquatic Chronic 1 - Lact. - Repr. 1A - STOT RE 1 Oral

Target Organs

Central nervous system,Blood,Immune system,Kidney

Storage Class Code

6.1C - Combustible acute toxic Cat.3 / toxic compounds or compounds which causing chronic effects

WGK

nwg

Flash Point(F)

Not applicable

Flash Point(C)

Not applicable

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Search for Certificates of Analysis (COA) by entering the products Lot/Batch Number. Lot and Batch Numbers can be found on a product’s label following the words ‘Lot’ or ‘Batch’.

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

X A Li et al.
Medical physics, 26(7), 1245-1251 (1999-08-06)
The purpose of this work is to study the dose enhancement by a thin foil (thickness of 0.2-4 mm) of high-Z material in a water phantom, irradiated by high-energy photon beams. EGS4 Monte Carlo technique was used. Perturbations on the
I Sewerin
Tandlaegebladet, 94(12), 483-486 (1990-09-01)
The lead foil of dental x-ray film packets may cause a number of artifacts; especially well known are the "tractor treads" and "herringbone patterns" following a backward filmpositioning in the patient's mouth. In the present paper a specific and seldomly
George X Ding
Medical physics, 29(11), 2459-2463 (2002-12-05)
This study investigates a possible cause of reported significant dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for high-energy photon beams in large fields. A proposed hypothesis was that the discrepancy was caused by a source
A Janhom et al.
Dento maxillo facial radiology, 29(1), 20-27 (2000-02-02)
To determine the interaction between image noise and file compression, with special emphasis on the accuracy of caries diagnosis. Fifty-nine bitewing radiographs of patients were taken simultaneously with Ektaspeed Plus (Eastman-Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) film without lead foil and the
Antonio Lopez Medina et al.
Physics in medicine and biology, 49(1), 17-32 (2004-02-20)
Two dosimetry protocols based on absorbed dose to water have recently been implemented: TG-51 and TRS-398. These protocols use different beam-quality indices: %dd(10)x and TPR20,10. The effect of electron contamination in measurements of %dd(10)x has been proposed as a disadvantage
View All Related Papers

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service