Skip to Content
Merck
All Photos(2)

Key Documents

View All Documentation

GF24492595

Lead

foil, 1m coil, thickness 1.0mm, as rolled, 99.5%

Synonym(s):

Lead, PB000413

Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing
All Photos(2)

About This Item

Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
Pb
CAS Number:
7439-92-1
Molecular Weight:
207.20
MDL number:
MFCD00134050
UNSPSC Code:
12141723
PubChem Substance ID:
329803773
NACRES:
NA.23

Assay

99.50%

form

foil

manufacturer/tradename

Goodfellow 244-925-95

resistivity

20.65 μΩ-cm

L × thickness

1 m × 1.0 mm

bp

1740 °C (lit.)

mp

327.4 °C (lit.)

SMILES string

[Pb]

InChI

1S/Pb

InChI key

WABPQHHGFIMREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N

General description

For updated SDS information please visit www.goodfellow.com.

Legal Information

Product of Goodfellow

Pictograms

Health hazardEnvironment
GHS08,GHS09

Signal Word

Danger

Hazard Statements

H360FD,H362,H372,H410

Hazard Classifications

Aquatic Acute 1 - Aquatic Chronic 1 - Lact. - Repr. 1A - STOT RE 1 Oral

Target Organs

Central nervous system,Blood,Immune system,Kidney

Storage Class Code

6.1C - Combustible acute toxic Cat.3 / toxic compounds or compounds which causing chronic effects

WGK

nwg

Flash Point(F)

Not applicable

Flash Point(C)

Not applicable

Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number

Sorry, we don't have COAs for this product available online at this time.

If you need assistance, please contact Customer Support.

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

D W Rogers
Medical physics, 26(4), 533-537 (1999-05-05)
Data are presented to allow the photon beam quality specifier being used in the new AAPM TG-51 protocol, %dd(10)x, to be extracted from depth-dose data measured with a 1 mm lead foil either 50 cm or 30 cm from the
George X Ding
Medical physics, 29(11), 2459-2463 (2002-12-05)
This study investigates a possible cause of reported significant dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for high-energy photon beams in large fields. A proposed hypothesis was that the discrepancy was caused by a source
Antonio Lopez Medina et al.
Physics in medicine and biology, 49(1), 17-32 (2004-02-20)
Two dosimetry protocols based on absorbed dose to water have recently been implemented: TG-51 and TRS-398. These protocols use different beam-quality indices: %dd(10)x and TPR20,10. The effect of electron contamination in measurements of %dd(10)x has been proposed as a disadvantage
H Fujita et al.
The British journal of radiology, 82(978), 504-508 (2009-01-21)
It is useful to utilise a computed radiography system with a combination of storage phosphor plates and therapy cassettes for portal images. However, the therapy cassette has some disadvantages. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the
A M Harris et al.
Nuclear medicine communications, 21(9), 851-855 (2000-11-07)
During measurements of the extrinsic spatial resolution of a gamma camera, it was noted that there was a variation with the position in the field of view. The problem was traced to the collimator, and this was confirmed by inspection
View All Related Papers

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service