跳转至内容
Merck
  • The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability.

The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability.

The Journal of oral implantology (2014-05-02)
Konstantinos X Michalakis, Pasquale Lino Calvani, Sinan Muftu, Argiris Pissiotis, Hiroshi Hirayama
摘要

Dental implants with an internal connection have been designed to establish a better stress distribution when lateral external forces act on the prosthesis and minimize the forces transmitted to the fastening screw. In the present study, 10 externally and 10 internally hexed implants were tested with a compressive force applied with an Instron Universal machine. Four cycles of loading-unloading were applied to each specimen to achieve displacements of 0.5, 1, 2, and 2.5 mm. The mean loads for the first cycle were 256.70 N for the external connection and 256 N for the internal connection implants. The independent t test did not reveal any significant differences among the 2 tested groups (P = .780). For the second cycle, the mean loads needed for a displacement of 1 mm were 818.19 N and 780.20 N for the external connection and the internal connection implants, respectively. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the 2 tested groups (P < .001). In the third cycle, the mean load values for a 2-mm displacement were 1394.10 N and 1225.00 N. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the 2 tested groups (P < .001). The mean loads for the fourth cycle were 1488.00 N for the external connection and 1029.00 N for the internal connection implants. These loads were required for a displacement of 2.5 mm. The independent t test revealed significant differences among the 2 tested groups (P < .001). The results of this in vitro study suggest that the internal connection design of the examined implant system could not prevent screw loosening during overloading. No implant or prosthesis failure was noticed in either group.

材料
货号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, average Mw ~350,000 by GPC
Sigma-Aldrich
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯
Sigma-Aldrich
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, average Mw ~15,000 by GPC, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, powder, <45 μm avg. part. size, 99.98% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 0.127 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 0.25 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, powder, −100 mesh, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, wire, diam. 0.25 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, sponge, 1-20 mm, 99.5% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 2.0 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
等规聚(甲基丙烯酸甲酯), >80% isotactic
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 0.025 mm, 99.98% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 0.5 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, sputtering target, diam. × thickness 2.00 in. × 0.25 in., 99.995% trace metals basis
钛, mesh, 100x100mm, nominal aperture 0.19mm, wire diameter 0.23mm, 60x60 wires/inch, open area 20%, twill weave
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 0.127 mm, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
钛, mesh, 100x100mm, nominal aperture 4.3mm, wire diameter 1.5mm, 4.4x4.4 wires/inch, open area 94%, platinized diamond mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 0.25 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Supelco
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, analytical standard, for GPC, 2,000
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, wire, diam. 1.0 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, 5-10 mm, ≥99.99% trace metals basis (purity exclusive of Na and K content)
Supelco
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, analytical standard, for GPC, 10,000
Supelco
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, analytical standard, for GPC, 100,000
Supelco
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, analytical standard, for GPC, 50,000
Supelco
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, analytical standard, for GPC, 20,000
Sigma-Aldrich
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, CP
Supelco
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, analytical standard, for GPC, 2,480,000
Supelco
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯, analytical standard, for GPC, average Mw 97,000 (Typical), average Mn 46,000 (Typical)
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, wire, diam. 0.5 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis