Skip to Content
Merck
  • Importance of a suitable working protocol for tape stripping experiments on porcine ear skin: Influence of lipophilic formulations and strip adhesion impairment.

Importance of a suitable working protocol for tape stripping experiments on porcine ear skin: Influence of lipophilic formulations and strip adhesion impairment.

International journal of pharmaceutics (2015-06-29)
C Nagelreiter, D Mahrhauser, K Wiatschka, S Skipiol, C Valenta
ABSTRACT

The tape stripping method is a very important tool for dermopharmacokinetic experiments in vitro and the accurate measurement of the removed corneocytes is key for a reliable calculation of a drug's skin penetration behavior. Therefore, various methods to quantify the amount of corneocytes removed with each tape strip have been employed, ranging from gravimetric approaches to protein assays and recently near infrared densitometry (NIR) has become very widely used. As this method is based on a reduction of light intensity, interference of formulation components seems conceivable, as they could scatter light and change the results. In this study, NIR measurements were compared to a protein assay and in addition, the influence of highly lipophilic formulations on the results of tape stripping experiments was investigated as impairment of the adherence of strips has been reported. To this end, different tape stripping protocols were employed. The obtained results ensure suitability of the NIR method and moreover suggest a more pronounced influence on adherence with increasing lipophilicity in applied formulations. The results show that adaptation of the tape stripping protocol to the specifications of envisioned experiments is important for reliable results. Two protocols were found favorable and are presented in this work.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, ultra dry, powder or crystals, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen chloride solution, 3 M in cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 32 wt. % in H2O, FCC
Sigma-Aldrich
Fludrocortisone acetate, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, ~6 M in H2O, for amino acid analysis
Supelco
Chloroform, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.8%, contains 0.5-1.0% ethanol as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Isopropyl myristate, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
3-Ethyl-2,4-pentanedione, mixture of tautomers, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, BioUltra, for luminescence, ≥98.0% (T), pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%, contains amylenes as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, anhydrous, contains amylenes as stabilizer, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile solution, contains 0.1 % (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile solution, contains 0.1 % (v/v) formic acid, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Isopropyl myristate, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Diclofenac sodium salt
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid, 36.5-38.0%, BioReagent, for molecular biology
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 1.0 N, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 1.0 N, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, BioUltra, for molecular biology, 10 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, ≥99%, PCR Reagent, contains amylenes as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, anhydrous, ≥99%, contains 0.5-1.0% ethanol as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Isopropyl alcohol, ≥99.7%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium phosphate dibasic solution, BioUltra, 0.5 M in H2O
Supelco
Hydrochloric acid solution, volumetric, 0.1 M HCl (0.1N), endotoxin free
Sigma-Aldrich
Isopropyl myristate, ≥90% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, electronic grade, 99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, electronic grade, 99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Potassium phosphate monobasic, BioUltra, for molecular biology, anhydrous, ≥99.5% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium phosphate dibasic, 99.95% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Potassium phosphate monobasic, 99.99% trace metals basis