Skip to Content
Merck
All Photos(2)

Key Documents

View All Documentation

GF96162037

Lead

foil, not light tested, 25x25mm, thickness 0.02mm, 99.99+%

Synonym(s):

Lead, PB000150

Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing
All Photos(2)

About This Item

Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
Pb
CAS Number:
7439-92-1
Molecular Weight:
207.20
MDL number:
MFCD00134050
UNSPSC Code:
12141723
PubChem Substance ID:
329814494
NACRES:
NA.23

Assay

≥99.99%

form

foil

manufacturer/tradename

Goodfellow 961-620-37

resistivity

20.65 μΩ-cm

bp

1740 °C (lit.)

mp

327.4 °C (lit.)

SMILES string

[Pb]

InChI

1S/Pb

InChI key

WABPQHHGFIMREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Related Categories

General description

For updated SDS information please visit www.goodfellow.com.

Legal Information

Product of Goodfellow

Pictograms

Health hazardEnvironment
GHS08,GHS09

Signal Word

Danger

Hazard Statements

H360FD,H362,H372,H410

Hazard Classifications

Aquatic Acute 1 - Aquatic Chronic 1 - Lact. - Repr. 1A - STOT RE 1 Oral

Target Organs

Central nervous system,Blood,Immune system,Kidney

Storage Class Code

6.1C - Combustible acute toxic Cat.3 / toxic compounds or compounds which causing chronic effects

WGK

nwg

Flash Point(F)

Not applicable

Flash Point(C)

Not applicable

Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number

Sorry, we don't have COAs for this product available online at this time.

If you need assistance, please contact Customer Support.

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

X A Li et al.
Medical physics, 26(7), 1245-1251 (1999-08-06)
The purpose of this work is to study the dose enhancement by a thin foil (thickness of 0.2-4 mm) of high-Z material in a water phantom, irradiated by high-energy photon beams. EGS4 Monte Carlo technique was used. Perturbations on the
George X Ding
Medical physics, 29(11), 2459-2463 (2002-12-05)
This study investigates a possible cause of reported significant dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for high-energy photon beams in large fields. A proposed hypothesis was that the discrepancy was caused by a source
Antonio Lopez Medina et al.
Physics in medicine and biology, 49(1), 17-32 (2004-02-20)
Two dosimetry protocols based on absorbed dose to water have recently been implemented: TG-51 and TRS-398. These protocols use different beam-quality indices: %dd(10)x and TPR20,10. The effect of electron contamination in measurements of %dd(10)x has been proposed as a disadvantage
I Sewerin
Tandlaegebladet, 94(12), 483-486 (1990-09-01)
The lead foil of dental x-ray film packets may cause a number of artifacts; especially well known are the "tractor treads" and "herringbone patterns" following a backward filmpositioning in the patient's mouth. In the present paper a specific and seldomly
A Janhom et al.
Dento maxillo facial radiology, 29(1), 20-27 (2000-02-02)
To determine the interaction between image noise and file compression, with special emphasis on the accuracy of caries diagnosis. Fifty-nine bitewing radiographs of patients were taken simultaneously with Ektaspeed Plus (Eastman-Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) film without lead foil and the
View All Related Papers

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service