Skip to Content
Merck
All Photos(2)

Documents

80337

Supelco

(±)-Metoprolol (+)-tartrate salt

analytical standard

Synonym(s):

(±)1-(Isopropylamino)-3-[p-(β-methoxyethyl)phenoxy]-2-propanol (+)-tartrate salt, Lopressor

Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing
All Photos(2)

About This Item

Linear Formula:
(C15H25NO3)2 · C4H6O6
CAS Number:
56392-17-7
Molecular Weight:
684.81
EC Number:
260-148-9
MDL number:
MFCD00056257
UNSPSC Code:
41116107
PubChem Substance ID:
329768801
NACRES:
NA.24

grade

analytical standard

Quality Level

100

Assay

≥98.5% (HPLC)

shelf life

limited shelf life, expiry date on the label

technique(s)

HPLC: suitable
gas chromatography (GC): suitable

impurities

≤1.0% water

application(s)

forensics and toxicology
pharmaceutical (small molecule)

format

neat

SMILES string

O[C@H]([C@@H](O)C(O)=O)C(O)=O.COCCc1ccc(OCC(O)CNC(C)C)cc1.COCCc2ccc(OCC(O)CNC(C)C)cc2

InChI

1S/2C15H25NO3.C4H6O6/c2*1-12(2)16-10-14(17)11-19-15-6-4-13(5-7-15)8-9-18-3;5-1(3(7)8)2(6)4(9)10/h2*4-7,12,14,16-17H,8-11H2,1-3H3;1-2,5-6H,(H,7,8)(H,9,10)/t;;1-,2-/m..1/s1

InChI key

YGULWPYYGQCFMP-CEAXSRTFSA-N

Gene Information

human ... ADRB1(153)

Looking for similar products? Visit Product Comparison Guide

Application

Refer to the product′s Certificate of Analysis for more information on a suitable instrument technique. Contact Technical Service for further support.

Pictograms

Health hazardEnvironment
GHS08,GHS09

Signal Word

Warning

Hazard Statements

H361d,H411

Hazard Classifications

Aquatic Chronic 2 - Repr. 2

Storage Class Code

11 - Combustible Solids

WGK

WGK 3

Flash Point(F)

Not applicable

Flash Point(C)

Not applicable

Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number
BCCG2964
BCCF0040
BCCB6875
BCBV9207
BCBT8281

Don't see the Right Version?

If you require a particular version, you can look up a specific certificate by the Lot or Batch number.

Search for a COA

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

Reply: Carvedilol versus metoprolol, but which metoprolol? Effect on inappropriate cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.
Martin H Ruwald et al.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 63(18), 1933-1934 (2014-02-04)
V M Raju et al.
Clinical radiology, 69(7), 739-744 (2014-05-16)
To evaluate the usage, safety, and efficacy of high-dose intravenous metoprolol for heart rate reduction in computer tomographic (CT) coronary angiography. As this was retrospective analysis of anonymous data, medical ethics committee approval was waived by the regional health research
Wenhuan Li et al.
Medicine, 93(28), e329-e329 (2014-12-20)
The sensitivity and specificity of 5 different image sets of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of first-pass myocardial perfusion defects have not systematically been compared using positron emission tomography (PET) as a reference standard. Forty-nine consecutive patients, with
Julian Uwe Gabriel Wagner et al.
Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 138, 269-282 (2019-12-24)
Cellular specialization and interaction with other cell types in cardiac tissue is essential for the coordinated function of cell populations in the heart. The complex interplay between cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells and fibroblasts is necessary for adaptation but can also lead
Dan Wang et al.
Gene, 547(2), 195-201 (2014-06-07)
This study aims to compare the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol in alleviating viral myocarditis (VMC) induced by coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) in mice. A total of 116 Balb/c mice were included in this study. Ninety-six mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with
View All Related Papers

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service