跳转至内容
Merck
  • Comparison of the physiological relevance of systemic vs. portal insulin delivery to evaluate whole body glucose flux during an insulin clamp.

Comparison of the physiological relevance of systemic vs. portal insulin delivery to evaluate whole body glucose flux during an insulin clamp.

American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism (2014-12-18)
Tiffany D Farmer, Erin C Jenkins, Tracy P O'Brien, Gregory A McCoy, Allison E Havlik, Erik R Nass, Wendell E Nicholson, Richard L Printz, Masakazu Shiota
摘要

To understand the underlying pathology of metabolic diseases, such as diabetes, an accurate determination of whole body glucose flux needs to be made by a method that maintains key physiological features. One such feature is a positive differential in insulin concentration between the portal venous and systemic arterial circulation (P/S-IG). P/S-IG during the determination of the relative contribution of liver and extra-liver tissues/organs to whole body glucose flux during an insulin clamp with either systemic (SID) or portal (PID) insulin delivery was examined with insulin infusion rates of 1, 2, and 5 mU·kg(-1)·min(-1) under either euglycemic or hyperglycemic conditions in 6-h-fasted conscious normal rats. A P/S-IG was initially determined with endogenous insulin secretion to exist with a value of 2.07. During an insulin clamp, while inhibiting endogenous insulin secretion by somatostatin, P/S-IG remained at 2.2 with PID, whereas, P/S-IG disappeared completely with SID, which exhibited higher arterial and lower portal insulin levels compared with PID. Consequently, glucose disappearance rates and muscle glycogen synthetic rates were higher, but suppression of endogenous glucose production and liver glycogen synthetic rates were lower with SID compared with PID. When the insulin clamp was performed with SID at 2 and 5 mU·kg(-1)·min(-1) without managing endogenous insulin secretion under euglycemic but not hyperglycemic conditions, endogenous insulin secretion was completely suppressed with SID, and the P/S-IG disappeared. Thus, compared with PID, an insulin clamp with SID underestimates the contribution of liver in response to insulin to whole body glucose flux.

材料
货号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
D -(+)-葡萄糖, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
D -(+)-葡萄糖, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
葡萄糖, 97.5-102.0% anhydrous basis, meets EP, BP, JP, USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
D -(+)-葡萄糖, ≥99.5% (GC), BioXtra
USP
右旋糖, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
D -(+)-葡萄糖, BioUltra, anhydrous, ≥99.5% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
胰高血糖素, synthetic, powder, suitable for cell culture
Supelco
D -(+)-葡萄糖, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
D -(+)-葡萄糖, ACS reagent
Sigma-Aldrich
D -(+)-葡萄糖, suitable for mouse embryo cell culture, ≥99.5% (GC)
Supelco
葡萄糖, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
D -(+)-葡萄糖, Hybri-Max, powder, BioReagent, suitable for hybridoma
Sigma-Aldrich
胰高血糖素, ≥95% (HPLC), powder, synthetic
Sigma-Aldrich
D-葡萄糖-12C6, 16O6, 99.9 atom % 16O, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
D -(+)-葡萄糖, tested according to Ph. Eur.