Skip to Content
Merck
All Photos(2)

Key Documents

View All Documentation

GF10339040

Lead

foil, not light tested, 300x300mm, thickness 0.05mm, as rolled, 97% (Sn 1.5%, Sb 1.5%)

Synonym(s):

Lead, PB000261

Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing
All Photos(2)

About This Item

Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
Pb
CAS Number:
7439-92-1
Molecular Weight:
207.20
MDL number:
MFCD00134050
UNSPSC Code:
12141723
PubChem Substance ID:
329801622
NACRES:
NA.23

Assay

≥97%

form

foil

manufacturer/tradename

Goodfellow 103-390-40

resistivity

20.65 μΩ-cm

bp

1740 °C (lit.)

mp

327.4 °C (lit.)

SMILES string

[Pb]

InChI

1S/Pb

InChI key

WABPQHHGFIMREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N

General description

For updated SDS information please visit www.goodfellow.com.

Legal Information

Product of Goodfellow

Pictograms

Health hazardEnvironment
GHS08,GHS09

Signal Word

Danger

Hazard Statements

H360FD,H362,H372,H410

Hazard Classifications

Aquatic Acute 1 - Aquatic Chronic 1 - Lact. - Repr. 1A - STOT RE 1 Oral

Target Organs

Central nervous system,Blood,Immune system,Kidney

Storage Class Code

6.1C - Combustible acute toxic Cat.3 / toxic compounds or compounds which causing chronic effects

WGK

nwg

Flash Point(F)

Not applicable

Flash Point(C)

Not applicable

Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number

Sorry, we don't have COAs for this product available online at this time.

If you need assistance, please contact Customer Support.

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

George X Ding
Medical physics, 29(11), 2459-2463 (2002-12-05)
This study investigates a possible cause of reported significant dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for high-energy photon beams in large fields. A proposed hypothesis was that the discrepancy was caused by a source
Antonio Lopez Medina et al.
Physics in medicine and biology, 49(1), 17-32 (2004-02-20)
Two dosimetry protocols based on absorbed dose to water have recently been implemented: TG-51 and TRS-398. These protocols use different beam-quality indices: %dd(10)x and TPR20,10. The effect of electron contamination in measurements of %dd(10)x has been proposed as a disadvantage
H Fujita et al.
The British journal of radiology, 82(978), 504-508 (2009-01-21)
It is useful to utilise a computed radiography system with a combination of storage phosphor plates and therapy cassettes for portal images. However, the therapy cassette has some disadvantages. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the
Adam S C Siu et al.
Implant dentistry, 12(1), 35-40 (2003-04-23)
Preoperative radiographic assessment is mandatory for the meticulous treatment planning and successful placement of implants. The precise topographical evaluation of selected implant sites, apart from the most straightforward cases, requires tomographic examination with the use of diagnostic radiographic templates. The
Leonard J S Tsuji et al.
Journal (Canadian Dental Association), 71(1), 35-38 (2005-01-15)
The lead content of the foil backing of 4 types of intraoral film commonly used by dentists was 69% to 85%. An environmental issue exists because these foils are typically thrown out with regular refuse, even though recycling programs exist.
View All Related Papers

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service