Skip to Content
Merck
  • A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.

A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals (2010-09-17)
Sean Ekins, Antony J Williams, Jinghai J Xu
ABSTRACT

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most important reasons for drug development failure at both preapproval and postapproval stages. There has been increased interest in developing predictive in vivo, in vitro, and in silico models to identify compounds that cause idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. In the current study, we applied machine learning, a Bayesian modeling method with extended connectivity fingerprints and other interpretable descriptors. The model that was developed and internally validated (using a training set of 295 compounds) was then applied to a large test set relative to the training set (237 compounds) for external validation. The resulting concordance of 60%, sensitivity of 56%, and specificity of 67% were comparable to results for internal validation. The Bayesian model with extended connectivity functional class fingerprints of maximum diameter 6 (ECFC_6) and interpretable descriptors suggested several substructures that are chemically reactive and may also be important for DILI-causing compounds, e.g., ketones, diols, and α-methyl styrene type structures. Using Smiles Arbitrary Target Specification (SMARTS) filters published by several pharmaceutical companies, we evaluated whether such reactive substructures could be readily detected by any of the published filters. It was apparent that the most stringent filters used in this study, such as the Abbott alerts, which captures thiol traps and other compounds, may be of use in identifying DILI-causing compounds (sensitivity 67%). A significant outcome of the present study is that we provide predictions for many compounds that cause DILI by using the knowledge we have available from previous studies. These computational models may represent cost-effective selection criteria before in vitro or in vivo experimental studies.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Potassium dichromate, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%
Supelco
Oxibendazole, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Supelco
Temozolomide, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Supelco
3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxytoluene, analytical standard
Supelco
Menadione (K3), analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
2,6-Diisopropylphenol, 97%
Aflatoxin B1 solution, 3.79 μg/g in acetonitrile, ERM®, certified reference material
Sigma-Aldrich
(S)-(+)-6-Methoxy-α-methyl-2-naphthaleneacetic acid, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
3-Acetamidophenol, 97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrazine solution, 35 wt. % in H2O
SAFC
L-Arginine
Sigma-Aldrich
Ergocalciferol, ≥98.0% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
Supelco
Dexamethasone, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
Biotin, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
Adenosine, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, powder, γ-irradiated, BioXtra, suitable for cell culture, ≥80% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Adenosine, suitable for cell culture, BioReagent
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Biotin, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Biotin, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Ampicillin sodium salt, powder or crystals, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
DL-Aminoglutethimide
Sigma-Aldrich
Ketoprofen, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochlorothiazide, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ethionine, ≥99% (TLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, meets USP testing specifications, anhydrous
Sigma-Aldrich
Betamethasone, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Oxibendazole, ~98%
Sigma-Aldrich
13-cis-Retinoic acid, ≥98% (HPLC)