Skip to Content
Merck
  • A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.

A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals (2010-09-17)
Sean Ekins, Antony J Williams, Jinghai J Xu
ABSTRACT

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most important reasons for drug development failure at both preapproval and postapproval stages. There has been increased interest in developing predictive in vivo, in vitro, and in silico models to identify compounds that cause idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. In the current study, we applied machine learning, a Bayesian modeling method with extended connectivity fingerprints and other interpretable descriptors. The model that was developed and internally validated (using a training set of 295 compounds) was then applied to a large test set relative to the training set (237 compounds) for external validation. The resulting concordance of 60%, sensitivity of 56%, and specificity of 67% were comparable to results for internal validation. The Bayesian model with extended connectivity functional class fingerprints of maximum diameter 6 (ECFC_6) and interpretable descriptors suggested several substructures that are chemically reactive and may also be important for DILI-causing compounds, e.g., ketones, diols, and α-methyl styrene type structures. Using Smiles Arbitrary Target Specification (SMARTS) filters published by several pharmaceutical companies, we evaluated whether such reactive substructures could be readily detected by any of the published filters. It was apparent that the most stringent filters used in this study, such as the Abbott alerts, which captures thiol traps and other compounds, may be of use in identifying DILI-causing compounds (sensitivity 67%). A significant outcome of the present study is that we provide predictions for many compounds that cause DILI by using the knowledge we have available from previous studies. These computational models may represent cost-effective selection criteria before in vitro or in vivo experimental studies.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform solution, NMR reference standard, 3% in acetone-d6 (99.9 atom % D)
Supelco
Melting point standard 235-237°C, analytical standard
Supelco
4,4′-Diaminodiphenylmethane, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Ethylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate, 98%
Supelco
Chloroform solution, certified reference material, 5000 μg/mL in methanol
Supelco
Nicotinic acid, analytical standard
Supelco
L-Ascorbic acid, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, FCC, FG
Supelco
2-Ethylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate, analytical standard
Supelco
Cyclosporin A, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Vitamin D2 solution, 100 μg/mL in ethanol, 98% (CP)
Sigma-Aldrich
5-Iodo-2′-deoxyuridine, ≥99% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Amitriptyline hydrochloride, ≥98% (TLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Nicotinic acid, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetylsalicylic acid, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, reagent grade
Sigma-Aldrich
Ammonium chloride, for molecular biology, suitable for cell culture, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ursodeoxycholic acid, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Nicotinic acid, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, suitable for cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrocortisone-Water Soluble, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, powder, suitable for cell culture, γ-irradiated
Sigma-Aldrich
Griseofulvin, from Penicillium griseofulvum, 97.0-102.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetylsalicylic acid, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Tetracaine hydrochloride, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Mexiletine hydrochloride, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, BioXtra, ≥99.0%, crystalline
Sigma-Aldrich
Nifedipine, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Indomethacin, meets USP testing specifications