Co-culture of Tumor and Stromal Cells in TrueGel3D^™ Hydrogels

Introduction

Tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex aggregation of malignant cells and non-transformed cells (fibroblasts, neuroendocrine cells, blood and inflammatory cells). The cells within TME have dynamic and tumor regulating functions at all stages of cancer (initiation, progression and metastasis).

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems provide physiologically relevant information in research and drug development more than the traditional 2D culture systems. The additional dimensionality of 3D cultures accurately mimic microenvironments and demonstrate similar cellular responses to in-vivo conditions. TrueGel3D™ hydrogel systems are biochemically defined and easy to use model systems to design biomimetic hydrogels that can mimic natural extracellular matrices (ECM). The objective of this study is to investigate the compatibility of TrueGel3D™ hydrogels for the co-culture of cancer cells and stromal cells.  

Methods

TrueGel3D™ hydrogel preparation

All steps were performed in a sterile hood and the volume ratio of each component was added as indicated below.

Components (TRUE3, TRUERGD)	Final Concentration	Volume (µL)
Water	NA	9.2	Cell Suspension Mix (25.5 µL)
TrueGel3D™ buffer, 10X concentrated, pH 5.5	NA	2.0
FAST-DEXTRAN (30 mmol/L)	3.5 mmol/L	3.5
TrueGel3D™ RGD integrin adhesion peptide (20 mmol/L)	0.5 mmol/L	0.8
MCF-7 cell suspension	1 X 105 cells/mL	5.0
Fibroblasts cell suspension	3.3 X 105 cells/mL	5.0
CD cell-degradable crosslinker (20 mmol/L)	3 mmol/L	4.5
Total		30.0

1. Cell suspension was prepared using the following cell culture medium: DMEM (low glucose) containing 4 mmol/L L-Glutamine and DMEM/HAM’sF12 (1:1) containing 2.5 mmol/L L-glutamine. The two media were mixed at a ratio of 1:2 supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS.
2. Water, 10X buffer (pH 5.5) and FAST-DEXTRAN were mixed in a reaction tube.
3. TrueGel3D™ RGD integrin adhesion peptide was added to the reaction tube containing FAST-DEXTRAN and mixed immediately to ensure homogenous distribution; it was followed by 5 min incubation to allow attachment of the RGD peptide to the maleimide groups of FAST-DEXTRAN polymer.
4. 4.5 µL of CD cell-degradable crosslinker was pipetted and spotted on the surface of a sterile 8-chamber slide with glass bottom chamber slide compatible with inverse microscopy.
5. The cell suspension was transferred to the reaction tube containing the FAST-DEXTRAN polymer (cell suspension mix).
6. 25.5 µL of cell suspension mix was transferred to the culture dish containing 4.5 µL of CD cell-degradable crosslinker and mixed quickly followed by a 3 min incubation for gel formation (gel formation starts a few seconds after mixing).
7. Once gel has formed, 350-400 µL of cell culture medium was added.
8. The culture plate was placed in the incubator. The medium was replaced after 1 hour.
9. The medium was changed as required for proper growth of the cells
10. Cells in hydrogel were treated on the 14^th day to proceed to epifluorescence microscopy.

Chemical cell fixation and epifluorescence microscopy

1. TrueGel3D™ hydrogels containing cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (with Ca⁺⁺/Mg⁺⁺) for 1 hour and washed four times for 5 min in PBS (w/o Ca⁺⁺/Mg⁺⁺).
2. Hydrogels were incubated with 0.5% (v/v) Triton^® X-100 in PBS (w/o Ca⁺⁺/Mg⁺⁺⁾  for 10 min and washed three times (10 min each) in PBS (w/o Ca⁺⁺/Mg⁺⁺⁾.
3. Actin staining: Hydrogels were incubated with 1.7 µg/mL phalloidin-TRITC in PBS (w/o Ca⁺⁺/Mg⁺⁺⁾  for 1.5 hour in the dark and washed three times (5 min each) in PBS (w/o Ca⁺⁺/Mg⁺⁺⁾.
4. Nuclei Staining: Hydrogels were incubated with 17 µmol/L Syto 24 Green^® (Invitrogen) for 30 min at room temperature in the dark.
5. Hydrogels were washed three times (5 min each) with PBS (w/o Ca⁺⁺/Mg⁺⁺⁾  and stored in PBS (w/o Ca⁺⁺/Mg⁺⁺⁾  at 4 ⁰C before epifluorescence microscopy analysis.

Results

When cultured alone in TrueGel3D™ hydrogels, MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines formed tumor-like spheroids whereas, the human dermal fibroblasts appeared outstretched like in physiological conditions. Co-culture of both cell types in TrueGel3D™ hydrogel retained the physiological and morphological characteristics even after 14 days, and represented a perfect tumor-stroma model to study tumor microenvironment.

Figure 1. Mono- and co-culture of MCF-7 cells and fibroblasts in TrueGel3D™ hydrogels. A: MCF-7 cells cultured alone, B: human fibroblasts cultured alone, C: Co-culture of MCF-7 and fibroblasts. Red: Actin cytoskeleton; green: nuclei. Scale bar: 100 µM.

Discussion

TrueGel3D™ hydrogel support co-culture models to evaluate the effects of cell-cell interaction and secreted factors on cellular response. MCF7 cell lines grown in TrueGel3D™ hydrogels exhibit characteristics of avascular tumors and allows monitoring of spheroid formation under optical microscopy. Unlike MCF-7 monolayer cells, the spheroids are better models to study drug penetration behavior, cell apoptosis, cell cycle distribution and gene expression¹.

The outstretched fibroblasts grown in a 3D environment resemble in-vivo conditions, increase cell migration and proliferative activity of cancer cells, serving better models for epithelial-mesenchymal transition². The TrueGel3D™ hydrogel also enables post culture analysis (PCR, blotting) to investigate the effects molecular factors on cell behavior.

3D co-culture is not limited to the study of cancer biology³, but instead empirical evidence shows use in various applications including osteogenic differentiation⁴, chondrocyte differentiation⁵, angiogenesis⁶, drug screening⁷, and peripheral nerve studies⁸.

References

1. Gong X, Lin C, Cheng J, Su J, Zhao H, Liu T, Wen X, Zhao P. Generation of Multicellular Tumor Spheroids with Microwell-Based Agarose Scaffolds for Drug Testing. PLoS ONE. 10(6):e0130348. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130348

2. Kim S, Lee EK, Kuh H. 2015. Co-culture of 3D tumor spheroids with fibroblasts as a model for epithelial?mesenchymal transition in vitro. Experimental Cell Research. 335(2):187-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.05.016

3. Liu T, Lin B, Qin J. 2010. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts promoted tumor spheroid invasion on a microfluidic 3D co-culture device. Lab Chip. 10(13):1671. https://doi.org/10.1039/c000022a

4. Buschmann J, Welti M, Hemmi S, Neuenschwander P, Baltes C, Giovanoli P, Rudin M, Calcagni M. 2011. Three-Dimensional Co-Cultures of Osteoblasts and Endothelial Cells in DegraPol Foam: Histological and High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analyses of Pre-Engineered Capillary Networks in Bone Grafts. Tissue Engineering Part A. 17(3-4):291-299. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0278

5. Meretoja VV, Dahlin RL, Wright S, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. 2014. Articular Chondrocyte Redifferentiation in 3D Co-cultures with Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 20(6):514-523. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0532

6. Hadjizadeh A, Doillon CJ. Directional migration of endothelial cells towards angiogenesis using polymer fibres in a 3D co-culture system. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 4(7):524-531. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.269

7. Lan S, Starly B. 2011. Alginate based 3D hydrogels as an in vitro co-culture model platform for the toxicity screening of new chemical entities. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 256(1):62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2011.07.013

8. Daud MF, Pawar KC, Claeyssens F, Ryan AJ, Haycock JW. 2012. An aligned 3D neuronal-glial co-culture model for peripheral nerve studies. Biomaterials. 33(25):5901-5913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.008