Detection of Protein-protein Interactions by in situ PLA

Detection of Protein-protein Interactions by in situ PLA with Prestige Monoclonals and Prestige Polyclonals

Proteins are complex biological molecules essential for cellular structure and functions. The majority of proteins commonly interact with various molecules, including other proteins, in order to exert their functions. These protein-protein interactions are involved in a wide range of cellular processes, including e.g. protein modifications, transport, signaling and cell cycling.

Studies of protein interactions are critical for the characterization of protein functions in the context of cell biology in both normal state and disease. A number of techniques for assessing the protein interactions are available, such as co-immunoprecipitation, pulldown assay, crosslinking and far-Western blot analysis. Although these techniques provide powerful tools for studying interactions of the proteins, they lack the subcellular resolution possible with microscopy-based analysis of native tissues or cells.

A proximity ligation assay (PLA) (Duolink^®) is a technique which allows for studying protein-protein interactions in tissues or cells in situ (is PLA).¹ This method can be used for detection, visualization and quantification of protein-protein interactions, as well as for detection of individual proteins and protein modifications in cells or tissue sections.

For achieving reliable results with the PLA assay, the choice of primary antibodies is crucial. Only specific and selective antibodies will enable a successful PLA reaction. General requirements for the primary antibodies are that they should be of IgG class, affinitypurified and not least, target-specific. In addition, for the detection of protein-protein interaction, the two primary antibodies must be raised in two different species, i.e. rabbit and mouse.

In this context, Atlas Antibodies provides a great resource of primary antibodies which can be used for PLA assay. More than 18000 polyclonal (Prestige Polyclonals) and 270 monoclonal (Prestige Monoclonals) antibodies are available in the catalogue, together targeting more than 75% of the human protein coding genes. Both the Prestige Polyclonals and Prestige Monoclonals are developed using carefully designed antigens. The highest levels of specificity, reproducibility and versatility are achieved by a unique antibody purification process using the recombinant antigen as affinity ligand for the Prestige Polyclonals. Prestige Monoclonals are purified on protein A columns. Importantly, the antibody specificity is validated by an extensive IHC analysis in 44 normal and 20 cancerous human tissues.

As mentioned above, the main advantages of is PLA in comparison to other techniques is the possibility to detect protein-protein interactions with subcellular resolution in native tissue sections or cells using microscopy. This can be particularly important in e.g. cancer research, including disease diagnostics, patient stratification and biomarker studies.²

Careful consideration of the fixation protocol is necessary to ensure the optimal preservation of morphology of the specimen and the target antigen. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) sections usually provide an optimal preservation of tissue morphology. Importantly, all antibodies in Atlas Antibodies catalogue are validated and approved for use in human (and in some cases rodent) FFPE samples following heat-induced epitope retrieval.

In situ PLA principle

Is PLA³ is based on the use of oligonucleotide-labelled antibodies (PLA probes), which generate a signal only when the two probes are in a very close proximity (about 30 nm). One of the DNA probes in the created DNA circle serves then as a primer for the rolling circle amplification (RCA) (Figure. 1 A, B). By adding a DNA polymerase, a long DNA product is formed and remains attached to the PLA probe (Figure. 1 C). After finalizing the RCA, the concatemeric repetitions of the same sequence enable hybridization of multiple detection oligonucleotides (Figure. 1 D). The signal from each detected pair of PLA probes is an individual fluorescent spot which can be visualized under a microscope and quantified. The PLA signals (blobs, spots) can be assigned to a specific subcellular location and quantified using image analysis software, e.g. BlobFinder.⁴

Figure 1. Schematic drawing of PLA reaction. Following incubation with primary antibodies, incubate with PLA probes PLUS and MINUS (A). Hybridize connector oligos and use ligase to complete the DNA circle (B). Roling circle amplification (C). Hybridize fluorescence-labeled oligonucleotides for signal detection (D).

is PLA – a Short Protocol

1. Tissue pre-treatment for optimal antibody performance (e.g. HIER, pH=6)
2. Blocking
3. Primary antibodies incubation
4. Wash
5. PLA^® probes incubation Incubate for 60 min at 37 °C.
6. Wash
7. Ligation Incubate for 30 min at 37 °C.
8. Amplification Incubate for 100 min at 37 °C.
9. Wash
10. Preparation for imaging

Mount the samples with Duolink In Situ Mounting Medium with DAPI.

Below, we provide three examples for detection of protein-protein interactions in FFPE human tissue sections by is PLA with Prestige Monoclonals and Prestige Polyclonals.

Emerin-lamins interactions in the nuclear membrane

The nuclear envelope delineates nucleus from cytoplasm, preserves the structural integrity of the nucleus and controls molecular passage between nucleus and cytoplasm.⁵ Emerin (EMD) is an inner nuclear membrane protein, involved in both mechanical integrity of the nucleus and tissuespecific gene regulation.⁶ The nuclear lamins are major components of the nuclear lamina underlying the inner nuclear membrane. They act as a bridge between the inner nuclear membrane and chromatin⁷ providing mechanical support to the nuclear envelope, maintaining proper chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation.⁸ Interactions between emerin and lamins are important for maintenance of nuclear integrity.⁹ Mutations in emerin and lamin genes produce pathologies known as ‘nuclear envelopathies’.¹⁰

Here, we have used the Anti-EMD mouse monoclonal antibody AMAb90560 (1:5000, Figure. 2 A) and Anti- LMNA rabbit polyclonal antibody (HPA006660, 1:30, not shown) or LMNB1 rabbit polyclonal antibody (HPA050524, 1:150 Figure. 2 B) respectively to visualize EMD-LMNA (Figure. 2 C) and EMD-LMNB1 (Figure. 2 D) interactions in the nuclear membrane of stratified squamous epithelium cells. Note the red immunofluorescence PLA signal located in the nuclear membrane area (Figure. 2 C, D) corresponding to the IHC staining (Figure. 2 A, B). Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (Figure. 2 C, D).

E-cadherin – beta-catenin interactions in the epithelial cells membrane

Epithelial cells serve as permeability barriers, separating underlying cells from the environment. This function requires that the cells are tightly connected to each other. E-cadherin (CDH1), a transmembrane protein forming complex with beta-catenin (CTNNB1), plays a key role in cellular adhesion in the epithelial cells. The loss of catenin from the cadherin-mediated cell-cell contacts is an important factor in the epithelialmesenchymal transition (EMT) process.^11,12 The EMT process has been proposed as an important event in the metastatic spread of tumour cells, where epithelial tumour cells acquire a more motile and invasive phenotype and disseminate from the primary tumour.¹³

Here, the Anti-CDH1 monoclonal antibody AMAb90865 (1:1000) and the Anti-CTNNB1 polyclonal antibody HPA029159 (1:600) were used to visualize the CDH1- CTNNB1 interaction in the membrane of normal epithelial tissues, including prostate (Figure. 3 A) fallopian tube (Figure. 3 B) and colon (Figure. 3 C). Note strong membranous positivity in the epithelial cells (Figure. 3 A-C) and the absence of PLA signal in the lymphoid tissue of tonsil (negative control, Figure. 3 D). Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI.

Figure 2. IHC staining with the Anti-EMD antibody AMAb90560 (A) and the Anti-LMNB1 antibody HPA050524 (B) shows distinct nuclear membrane immunoreactivity in the skin epithelial cells. Immunofluorescence is PLA signal shows protein-protein interactions between EMD och LMNA (C) and EMD och LMNB1 (D) in the nuclear membrane of skin epithelial cells respectively.

Figure 3. Immunofluorescence is PLA signal shows protein-protein interactions between CDH1 and CTNNB1 in the membranes of the epithelial cells in prostate (A), fallopian tube (B) and rectum (C). Tonsil was used as negative control (D).

Podocalyxin-like – ezrin interaction in the membranes of renal glomeruli

Cellular plasma membrane contains numerous types of proteins, involved e.g. in maintenance of the cell structure, transmembrane transport and signal transduction. Podocalyxin-like protein (PODXL) is a transmembrane sialomucin protein with anti-adhesive properties. In normal kidney, PODXL function is to maintain an open filtration pathway between neighbouring foot processes in the podocyte. PODXL was also shown to play a role in cancer development and aggressiveness^14-17, at least partly through its interaction with the actin-binding protein ezrin (EZR).^18,19

Both PODXL and EZR are expressed in the normal renal glomeruli membranes, as well as in the ciliated epithelium of fallopian tube. Here, we show the interaction of these proteins by is PLA, using the Anti- PODXL monoclonal antibody AMAb90644 (1:5000) and the Anti-EZR polyclonal antibody HPA021616 (1:2500). Note a strong PLA signal in renal glomerular membrane (Figure. 4 A, B), as well as in the apical membranes of the epithelial cells in fallopian tube (Figure. 4 C). Liver was used as negative control (Figure. 4 D). Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI.

Figure 4. Immunofluorescence PLA signal shows protein-protein interactions between PODXL and EZR in the membranes of renal glomeruli (A and B), as well as in the ciliated epithelium of the fallopian tube (C). Note the absence of PLA signal in renal tubules (A, B), as well as in the underlying connective tissue in the fallopian tube (C). Liver was used as negative control (D).

Summary

The data presented here demonstrates how the Prestige Polyclonals and Prestige Monoclonals can be used for detection of protein-protein interactions in human tissues in situ using a powerful PLA technique. Studies based on such data can further contribute to our understanding of protein functions in normal and pathological states.

References

1. Fredriksson S, Gullberg M, Jarvius J, Olsson C, Pietras K, Gústafsdóttir SM, Östman A, Landegren U. 2002. Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nat Biotechnol. 20(5):473-477. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0502-473

2. Blokzijl A, Friedman M, Pontén F, Landegren U. Profiling protein expression and interactions: proximity ligation as a tool for personalized medicine. 268(3):232-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02256.x

3. Söderberg O, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Ridderstråle K, Leuchowius K, Jarvius J, Wester K, Hydbring P, Bahram F, Larsson L, et al. 2006. Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat Methods. 3(12):995-1000. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth947

4. Allalou A, Wählby C. 2009. BlobFinder, a tool for fluorescence microscopy image cytometry. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 94(1):58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.08.006

5. Gerace L, Burke B. 1988. Functional Organization of the Nuclear Envelope. Annu. Rev. Cell. Biol.. 4(1):335-374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002003

6. Yorifuji H, Tadano Y, Tsuchiya Y, Ogawa M, Goto K, Umetani A, Asaka Y, Arahata K. 1997. Emerin, deficiency of which causes Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, is localized at the inner nuclear membrane. neurogenetics. 1(2):135-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100480050020

7. Ciska M, Moreno Díaz de la Espina S. The intriguing plant nuclear lamina. Front. Plant Sci.. 5 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00166

8. Luperchio TR, Wong X, Reddy KL. 2014. Genome regulation at the peripheral zone: lamina associated domains in development and disease. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 2550-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.021

9. Sakaki M, Koike H, Takahashi N, Sasagawa N, Tomioka S, Arahata K, Ishiura S. 2001. Interaction between Emerin and Nuclear Lamins. Journal of Biochemistry. 129(2):321-327. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a002860

10. Muchir A, Worman HJ. 2007. Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 7(1):78-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-007-0025-3

11. Wever O, Pauwels P, Craene B, Sabbah M, Emami S, Redeuilh G, Gespach C, Bracke M, Berx G. 2008. Molecular and pathological signatures of epithelial?mesenchymal transitions at the cancer invasion front. Histochem Cell Biol. 130(3):481-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-008-0464-1

12. Stemmer V, de Craene B, Berx G, Behrens J. 2008. Snail promotes Wnt target gene expression and interacts with ?-catenin. Oncogene. 27(37):5075-5080. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.140

13. Christiansen JJ, Rajasekaran AK. 2006. Reassessing Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition as a Prerequisite for Carcinoma Invasion and Metastasis. Cancer Res. 66(17):8319-8326. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0410

14. Casey G, Neville PJ, Liu X, Plummer SJ, Cicek MS, Krumroy LM, Curran AP, McGreevy MR, Catalona WJ, Klein EA, et al. 2006. Podocalyxin variants and risk of prostate cancer and tumor aggressiveness. 15(5):735-741. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi487

15. Larsson A, Johansson ME, Wangefjord S, Gaber A, Nodin B, Kucharzewska P, Welinder C, Belting M, Eberhard J, Johnsson A, et al. 2011. Overexpression of podocalyxin-like protein is an independent factor of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 105(5):666-672. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.295

16. Binder ZA, Siu I, Eberhart CG, ap Rhys C, Bai R, Staedtke V, Zhang H, Smoll NR, Piantadosi S, Piccirillo SG, et al. Podocalyxin-Like Protein Is Expressed in Glioblastoma Multiforme Stem-Like Cells and Is Associated with Poor Outcome. PLoS ONE. 8(10):e75945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075945

17. Boman K, Larsson AH, Segersten U, Kuteeva E, Johannesson H, Nodin B, Eberhard J, Uhlén M, Malmström P, Jirström K. 2013. Membranous expression of podocalyxin-like protein is an independent factor of poor prognosis in urothelial bladder cancer. Br J Cancer. 108(11):2321-2328. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.215

18. Orlando R. 2001. The glomerular epithelial cell anti-adhesin podocalyxin associates with the actin cytoskeleton through interactions with ezrin.. J Am Soc Nephrol. 12(8):1589–1598.

19. Sizemore S, Cicek M, Sizemore N, Ng KP, Casey G. 2007. Podocalyxin Increases the Aggressive Phenotype of Breast and Prostate Cancer Cells In vitro through Its Interaction with Ezrin. Cancer Research. 67(13):6183-6191. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3575