Saltar al contenido
MilliporeSigma

Identification of common horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.; Equisetaceae) using Thin Layer Chromatography versus DNA barcoding.

Scientific reports (2015-07-15)
C Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis, Sam Bruun-Lund, Natalie E Iwanycki, Ole Seberg, Gitte Petersen, Anna K Jäger, Nina Rønsted
RESUMEN

The global herbal products market has grown in recent years, making regulation of these products paramount for public healthcare. For instance, the common horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) is used in numerous herbal products, but it can be adulterated with closely related species, especially E. palustre L. that can produce toxic alkaloids. As morphology-based identification is often difficult or impossible, the identification of processed material can be aided by molecular techniques. In this study, we explore two molecular identification techniques as methods of testing the purity of these products: a Thin Layer Chromatography approach (TLC-test) included in the European Pharmacopoeia and a DNA barcoding approach, used in recent years to identify material in herbal products. We test the potential of these methods for distinguishing and identifying these species using material from herbarium collections and commercial herbal products. We find that both methods can discriminate between the two species and positively identify E. arvense. The TLC-test is more cost- and time-efficient, but DNA barcoding is more powerful in determining the identity of adulterant species. Our study shows that, although DNA barcoding presents certain advantages, other established laboratory methods can perform as well or even better in confirming species' identity in herbal products.

MATERIALES
Referencia del producto
Marca
Descripción del producto

Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeic acid, ≥98.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido cloroplatínico hydrate, ≥99.9% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Metanol, JIS special grade, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Diclorometano, anhydrous, ≥99.8%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
5α-Androstan-17β-ol-3-one, ≥97.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Metanol, SAJ first grade, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Tolueno, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Metanol, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido fórmico, ≥95%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetato de etilo
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido cloroplatínico hydrate, ~38% Pt basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetato de etilo, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, JIS special grade, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetato de etilo, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Diethylamine, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Diethylamine, purified by redistillation, 99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetato de etilo, natural, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido cloroplatínico hydrate, 99.995% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Tolueno, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Metanol, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido fórmico, JIS special grade, ≥98.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético solution, 1 M, 1 N
Sigma-Aldrich
Metanol, SAJ special grade
Sigma-Aldrich
Quercetin 3-D-galactoside, ≥97.0% (HPLC)
Supelco
Dichloromethane solution, contains 10 % (v/v) methanol