Skip to Content
Merck
  • Role of zinc interstitials and oxygen vacancies of ZnO in photocatalysis: a bottom-up approach to control defect density.

Role of zinc interstitials and oxygen vacancies of ZnO in photocatalysis: a bottom-up approach to control defect density.

Nanoscale (2014-07-25)
Fatma Kayaci, Sesha Vempati, Inci Donmez, Necmi Biyikli, Tamer Uyar
ABSTRACT

Oxygen vacancies (V(O)s) in ZnO are well-known to enhance photocatalytic activity (PCA) despite various other intrinsic crystal defects. In this study, we aim to elucidate the effect of zinc interstitials (Zn(i)) and V(O)s on PCA, which has applied as well as fundamental interest. To achieve this, the major hurdle of fabricating ZnO with controlled defect density requires to be overcome, where it is acknowledged that defect level control in ZnO is significantly difficult. In the present context, we fabricated nanostructures and thoroughly characterized their morphological (SEM, TEM), structural (XRD, TEM), chemical (XPS) and optical (photoluminescence, PL) properties. To fabricate the nanostructures, we adopted atomic layer deposition (ALD), which is a powerful bottom-up approach. However, to control defects, we chose polysulfone electrospun nanofibers as a substrate on which the non-uniform adsorption of ALD precursors is inevitable because of the differences in the hydrophilic nature of the functional groups. For the first 100 cycles, Zn(i)s were predominant in ZnO quantum dots (QDs), while the presence of V(O)s was negligible. As the ALD cycle number increased, V(O)s were introduced, whereas the density of Zn(i) remained unchanged. We employed PL spectra to identify and quantify the density of each defect for all the samples. PCA was performed on all the samples, and the percent change in the decay constant for each sample was juxtaposed with the relative densities of Zn(i)s and V(O)s. A logical comparison of the relative defect densities of Zn(i)s and V(O)s suggested that the former are less efficient than the latter because of the differences in the intrinsic nature and the physical accessibility of the defects. Other reasons for the efficiency differences were elaborated.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

SAFC
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, spectrophotometric grade, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, ReagentPlus®, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, puriss. p.a., ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, SAJ special grade
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, suitable for peptide synthesis, ≥99.8% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide-d9, 99 atom % D
Supelco
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
N,N-Dimethylacetamide, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%