Skip to Content
Merck
  • Effects of a dietary antioxidant blend and vitamin E on growth performance, oxidative status, and meat quality in broiler chickens fed a diet high in oxidants.

Effects of a dietary antioxidant blend and vitamin E on growth performance, oxidative status, and meat quality in broiler chickens fed a diet high in oxidants.

Poultry science (2014-05-28)
T Lu, A F Harper, J Zhao, R A Dalloul
ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to determine the effects of a dietary antioxidant blend (AB) and vitamin E on performance, oxidative status, and meat quality. Cobb 500 male broilers (n = 1,200, d 0) were randomly distributed into 6 treatments with 10 replicate pens. Treatments included 1) HO: high oxidant diet, vitamin E at 10 IU/kg, 3% oxidized soybean oil, 3% polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) source; 2) VE: the HO diet with vitamin E at 200 IU/kg; 3) AOX: the HO diet with AB at 135 mg/kg; 4) VE+AOX: the HO diet with vitamin E at 200 IU/kg and AB at 135 mg/kg; 5) SC: standard control; and 6) PC: positive control, the SC diet with AB at 135 mg/kg. From d 0 through d 21, high oxidant diet treatment birds had greater BW, ADG, and ADFI than the SC birds; the AOX birds had better G:F on d 10 and 42, and from d 0 to 42 than SC birds (P < 0.05). The plasma TBA reactive substance level was lower in the AOX birds than the VE treatment birds in all phases (P < 0.05). High oxidant diet treatment birds had greater α-1-acid glycoprotein levels on d 10 than SC and PC birds (P < 0.05). The AOX, PC, and SC birds had a greater level of uric acid than the HO and VE+AOX birds on d 10. Superoxide dismutase expression in the liver was less with the HO treatment compared with the SC treatment on d 7 (P < 0.05). The vitamin E concentration in the breast muscle was greatest in the VE birds, whereas vitamin A concentration was greater in the PC birds compared with the SC birds on d 21 (P < 0.05). Compared with VE and AOX, the HO treatment had greater drip loss (P < 0.05). In conclusion, dietary addition of AOX was effective in improving growth, moderately restored the whole body antioxidant capability, and reduced drip loss.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, average Mn ~86,000
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, average Mn ~120,000
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, average Mn ~10,000
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, average Mn ~90,000
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, viscosity 2,600-5,600 cP, 2 % in H2O(20 °C)(lit.)
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, viscosity 40-60 cP, 2 % in H2O(20 °C)(lit.)
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, viscosity 80-120 cP, 2 % in H2O(20 °C)(lit.)
Sigma-Aldrich
Hypromellose, meets USP testing specifications
USP
Hypromellose, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Propyl gallate, for microscopy, ≥98.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Propyl gallate, antioxidant, ≥98.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Propyl gallate, ≥98%, FCC
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethoxyquin, ≥75% (capillary GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Propyl gallate, powder
Supelco
Ethoxyquin, PESTANAL®, analytical standard
Supelco
Propyl gallate, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
USP
Propyl gallate, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard