Skip to Content
Merck
  • Hydroxyapatite and silk combination-coated dental implants result in superior bone formation in the peri-implant area compared with hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated implants.

Hydroxyapatite and silk combination-coated dental implants result in superior bone formation in the peri-implant area compared with hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated implants.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (2014-09-23)
HaeYong Kweon, Sang-Woon Lee, Byung-Dong Hahn, Yong-Chan Lee, Seong-Gon Kim
ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare bone formation after installation of uncoated (UC), hydroxyapatite-coated (HA), collagen plus HA-coated (CH), and silk plus HA-coated (SH) implants. Implants in the UC group had acid-etched surfaces. Surface coating was applied using the aerosol deposition method. Cellular responses on the coated surfaces were examined with scanning electron microscopy. Cellular responses to the surfaces were studied with the corresponding coated discs and MG63 cells. Subsequently, 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assays were performed. Peri-implant bone formation was evaluated with the rabbit tibia model. Twenty-four implants from each group were installed. The animals were sacrificed 6 weeks after implant installation. Peri-implant bone formation and implant-to-bone contact were measured in histologic sections. Significance of differences across groups was evaluated using analysis of variance. Scanning electron microscopic images showed that the CH and SH groups exhibited cells that appeared more spread out than those in the other groups. The SH group exhibited the highest value in the MTT assay. The CH group exhibited the highest level of ALP activity. Comparisons of these modifications with the acid-etched surfaces showed that the CH and SH groups displayed significantly greater peri-implant bone formation (P < .001). The SH group displayed significantly greater new bone formation and bone-to-implant contact than did the other groups.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.025 mm, 99.98% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Titanium, wire, diam. 1.0 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydroxyapatite, purum p.a., ≥90% (as Ca3(PO4)2, KT)
Titanium, IRMM®, certified reference material, 0.5 mm wire
Titanium, IRMM®, certified reference material, 0.5 mm foil
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydroxyapatite, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, FCC, E341, ≥90% (calculated on glowed substance)
Sigma-Aldrich
Titanium, wire, diam. 0.25 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Titanium, 5-10 mm, ≥99.99% trace metals basis (purity exclusive of Na and K content)
Sigma-Aldrich
Titanium, foil, thickness 2.0 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.127 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Titanium, wire, diam. 0.81 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, ≥97.5% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphatase, Alkaline bovine, recombinant, expressed in Pichia pastoris, ≥4000 units/mg protein
Titanium, microfoil, disks, 10mm, thinness 0.1μm, specific density 42.8μg/cm2, permanent mylar 3.5μm support, 99.6+%
Titanium, rod, 100mm, diameter 10mm, annealed, 99.6+%
Titanium, tube, 1000mm, outside diameter 9.5mm, inside diameter 8.2mm, wall thickness 0.65mm, annealed, 99.6+%
Titanium, microfoil, disks, 10mm, thinness 0.25μm, specific density 112.6μg/cm2, permanent mylar 3.5μm support, 99.6+%
Titanium, tube, 1000mm, outside diameter 12.7mm, inside diameter 10.9mm, wall thickness 0.9mm, annealed, 99.6+%
Titanium, rod, 100mm, diameter 16mm, as drawn, 99.99+%
Titanium, rod, 200mm, diameter 2mm, annealed, 99.6+%
Titanium, tube, 200mm, outside diameter 1.6mm, inside diameter 1.2mm, wall thickness 0.2mm, hard, 99.6+%
Titanium, microfoil, disks, 10mm, thinness 1.0μm, specific density 429μg/cm2, permanent mylar 3.5μm support, 99.6+%
Titanium, rod, 100mm, diameter 5mm, annealed, 99.6+%
Titanium, rod, 200mm, diameter 2mm, as drawn, 99.99+%
Titanium, tube, 200mm, outside diameter 6.35mm, inside diameter 5.53mm, wall thickness 0.41mm, annealed, 99.6+%
Titanium, tube, 100mm, outside diameter 6.1mm, inside diameter 5.1mm, wall thickness 0.5mm, annealed, 99.6+%
Titanium, rod, 200mm, diameter 3.0mm, annealed, 99.6+%
Titanium, microfoil, disks, 25mm, thinness 0.25μm, specific density 112.6μg/cm2, permanent mylar 3.5μm support, 99.6+%
Titanium, tube, 100mm, outside diameter 1.6mm, inside diameter 1.2mm, wall thickness 0.2mm, hard, 99.6+%