Skip to Content
Merck
HomeMicrobial Culture Media PreparationViable but Nonculturable (VBNC) Bacteria in Environmental Monitoring and Public Health

Viable but Nonculturable (VBNC) Bacteria in Environmental Monitoring and Public Health

Jvo Siegrist

Microbiology Focus Edition 1.4

Viable but non-culturable (VBNC) bacteria represent a unique state of microbial life where cells are alive but cannot be cultured using conventional laboratory techniques. In most cases, the non-spore-forming bacteria are in a survival state (e.g., resting, dormancy, quiescence, or debilitation) allowing them to endure unfavorable conditions while retaining their viability. The VNBC cells are nonculturable yet have the potential to revert to a culturable state, maintain measurable metabolic activity, and exhibit high membrane potential. Various terms, such as ‘active but nonculturable’ (ABNC) and ‘conditionally viable environmental cells’ (CVEC), have been used to describe similar microbial states, highlighting the complexity of bacterial viability.

A colorful illustration of Salmonella bacteria, depicted in purple color with flagella, set against a blurred blue background.

Salmonella Bacteria Microscopic View

The VBNC state is primarily induced by harsh environmental conditions such as nutrient starvation, extreme temperatures, abrupt changes in pH or salinity, osmotic stress, and oxygen availability can trigger this dormancy. Additionally, exposure to food preservatives, heavy metals, and decontaminating processes like pasteurization can lead to the VBNC state. While many believe that pathogens in this state cannot induce infections, studies have shown that VBNC bacteria can reactivate upon passing through a host, leading to potential infections.

Role of VBNC Bacteria in Environmental Monitoring and Pathogenicity

Understanding the VBNC state is crucial due to its implications in various fields, including public health, environmental monitoring, and food technology. VBNC bacteria have been detected in environmental and food industry settings, raising concerns about their potential health risks. For instance, recent research on Staphylococcus aureus revealed that VBNC cells could adhere to and invade host cells, evading immune responses while retaining pathogenicity.

As food processing and preservation methods evolve, understanding the conditions that induce the VBNC state is essential for mitigating risks associated with foodborne pathogens. Despite being undetectable by traditional culture methods, these bacteria can still pose significant health threats, especially in foodborne illnesses. Continued research into VBNC bacteria will enhance our understanding of microbial behavior, ultimately improving public health outcomes and food safety practices.

Challenges in Detecting Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria by Common Culture Methods

VBNC cells are considered viable and capable of replication, although the methods needed for their resuscitation are not fully understood. Culturing is a fundamental step in microbiology, with the plate count technique being a standard method for enumerating viable bacteria. It has been demonstrated that using specialized media or certain supplements can help recover these cells.

VBNC bacteria have often undergone a treatment like heating, drying, setting under high osmotic pressure (high salt content), or contact with inhibiting chemicals. The treatment resulted in sensitive cells or sub-lethally damaged cells, which can be caused by the loss of some ribosomes, damaged enzymes, and compromised cell membranes, all of which contribute to cellular malfunctions.

In recent years, several species, including Vibrio cholerae, E. coli, Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Yersinia enterocolitica, have been identified in the VBNC state. This condition can be referred to as "resuscitation," which describes the recovery of non-culturable cells. Research has shown that resuscitation can be triggered by physical stimuli, such as a temperature increase, as well as various chemical stimuli, including specific gas mixtures, amino acids, and nutrient-rich media. The addition of supplements to enriched media has significantly improved the recovery rates of many VBNC cells.

Application of Ferrioxamine E in the Growth and Recovery

Structure of Ferrioxamine E

Structure of Ferrioxamine E

Ferrioxamine E, an organo-metallic natural trihydroxamate siderophore, is used as an effective growth factor in culturing many VBNC cells. Supplementing the pre-enrichment and enrichment broths with ferrioxamine E significantly improved the recovery of SalmonellaCronobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Yersinia enterocolitica from artificially or naturally contaminated foods [1-3]. A concentration of ferrioxamine E in the range of 5-200 ng/mL supports growth (Table 1). Ferrioxamine E provides the essential micro-nutrient iron (III) to the organisms. This leads to a reduced lag phase in the medium and reactivates damaged bacteria.

Ferrioxamine E in Buffered Peptone Water is the recommended media of choice by the ISO-Norms for Enterobacteriacea. The motility of Salmonella is also improved, enabling their identification by semisolid selective motility media like MRSV, DIASSALM, or SMS.

Table 1.Recommended end concentration of Ferrioxamine E

Ferrioxamine E acts as a semi-selective agent in isolating small quantities of cells from dried powders like tea, spices, dried fruits, etc., as it does not improve the growth of E. coli, Shigella, Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella species. Ferrioxamine E with Desferrioxamine B is used as an enrichment media that enables fast and selective detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Desferrioxamine B  adsorbs iron traces and thus inhibits the growth of concomitant microorganisms, and Ferrioxamine E supports the growth of Staphylococcus aureus.

Related Products
Loading

References

1.
Makino S, Kii T, Asakura H, Shirahata T, Ikeda T, Takeshi K, Itoh K. 2000. Does Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 Enter the Viable but Nonculturable State in Salted Salmon Roe?. Appl Environ Microbiol. 66(12):5536-5539. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.12.5536-5539.2000
2.
Barcina I, Lebaron P, Vives-Rego J. Survival of allochthonous bacteria in aquatic systems: a biological approach. 23(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1997.tb00385.x
3.
Cho J, Kim S. 1999. Viable, but non-culturable, state of a green fluorescence protein-tagged environmental isolate ofSalmonella typhiin groundwater and pond water. 170(1):257-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13382.x
4.
Colwell RR, Brayton PR, Grimes DJ, Roszak DB, Huq SA, Palmer LM. 1985. Viable but Non-Culturable Vibrio cholerae and Related Pathogens in the Environment: Implications for Release of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms. Nat Biotechnol. 3(9):817-820. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0985-817
5.
Rollins DM, Colwell RR. 1986. Viable but nonculturable stage of Campylobacter jejuni and its role in survival in the natural aquatic environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 52(3):531-538. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.52.3.531-538.1986
6.
Roszak DB, Colwell RR. 1987. Metabolic activity of bacterial cells enumerated by direct viable count. Appl Environ Microbiol. 53(12):2889-2893. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.53.12.2889-2893.1987
7.
Roszak DB, Colwell RR. 1987. Survival strategies of bacteria in the natural environment. Microbiol Rev. 51(3):365-379. https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.51.3.365-379.1987
8.
Xu H-, Roberts N, Singleton FL, Attwell RW, Grimes DJ, Colwell RR. 1982. Survival and viability of nonculturableEscherichia coli andVibrio cholerae in the estuarine and marine environment. Microb Ecol. 8(4):313-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02010671
9.
Besnard V, Federighi M, Declerq E, Jugiau F, Cappelier J. 2002. Environmental and physico-chemical factors induce VBNC state in Listeriamonocytogenes. Vet. Res.. 33(4):359-370. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2002022
10.
Singh A, McFeters GA. 1987. Survival and virulence of copper- and chlorine-stressed Yersinia enterocolitica in experimentally infected mice. Appl Environ Microbiol. 53(8):1768-1774. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.53.8.1768-1774.1987
11.
Reissbrodt R, Heier H, Tschäpe H, Kingsley RA, Williams PH. 2000. Resuscitation by Ferrioxamine E of Stressed Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium from Soil and Water Microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 66(9):4128-4130. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.9.4128-4130.2000
12.
Reissbrodt R. 1996. Ferrioxamine E-supplemented pre-enrichment and enrichment media improve various isolation methods for Salmonella. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 29(1):81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(95)00024-0
13.
Pless P. 1995. Improvement of Salmonella detection on motility enrichment media by ferrioxamine E-supplementation of pre-enrichment culture. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 27(2-3):147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(94)00160-8
Sign In To Continue

To continue reading please sign in or create an account.

Don't Have An Account?