Skip to Content
Merck
  • Comparison of vildagliptin and glimepiride: effects on glycaemic control, fat tolerance and inflammatory markers in people with type 2 diabetes.

Comparison of vildagliptin and glimepiride: effects on glycaemic control, fat tolerance and inflammatory markers in people with type 2 diabetes.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association (2014-05-16)
G Derosa, A Bonaventura, L Bianchi, D Romano, E Fogari, A D'Angelo, P Maffioli
ABSTRACT

To compare the effects of vildagliptin with those of glimepiride on glycaemic control, fat tolerance and inflammatory markers in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving metformin treatment. A total of 167 participants were randomized to vildagliptin 50 mg twice a day or glimepiride 2 mg three times a day, for 6 months. We evaluated the following variables: BMI; glycaemic control; fasting plasma insulin; homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index; fasting plasma proinsulin; glucagon; lipid profile; adiponectin; high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; interleukin-6; and tumour necrosis factor-α. A euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp procedure and an oral fat load test were also performed. Despite a similar decrease in HbA1c levels (P = 0.009, and P = 0.008, respectively), body weight increased with glimepiride (P = 0.048 vs baseline) and decreased with vildagliptin (P = 0.041 vs baseline and vs glimepiride). Fasting plasma insulin and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index were significantly lower with vildagliptin compared with glimepiride (P = 0.035 and 0.047). M value, an index of insulin sensitivity, increased with vildagliptin, both compared with baseline and with glimepiride (P = 0.028 and 0.039, respectively). Vildagliptin improved all post-oral fat load peaks of lipid profile compared with glimepiride. Adiponectin levels were higher (P = 0.035) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were lower (P = 0.038) with vildagliptin vs glimepiride. During the oral fat load test, interleukin-6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and tumour necrosis factor-α peaks were lower and adiponectin peak was higher in the vildagliptin group than in the glimepiride group. There was a higher dropout rate as a result of hypoglycaemia in the glimepiride group than in the vildagliptin group. Vildagliptin was more effective than glimepiride in reducing post-oral fat load peaks of lipid-trafficking adipocytokines and inflammatory markers.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Glimepiride, ≥98% (HPLC), solid
USP
Glimepiride, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
SyntheChol® NS0 Supplement, 500 ×, synthetic cholesterol, animal component-free, aqueous solution, sterile-filtered, suitable for cell culture
Supelco
Cholesterol solution, certified reference material, 10 mg/mL in chloroform
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, from sheep wool, ≥92.5% (GC), powder
Glimepiride, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, Sigma Grade, ≥99%
SAFC
Cholesterol, from sheep wool, Controlled origin, meets USP/NF testing specifications
Supelco
Cholesterol, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
SAFC
Cholesterol, Plant-Derived, SyntheChol®