Saltar al contenido
Merck

Influence of 3-month Simulated Pulpal Pressure on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Simplified Resin Luting Systems.

The journal of adhesive dentistry (2015-07-15)
Ataís Bacchi, Gabriel Abuna, Ashvin Babbar, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa
RESUMEN

To assess the influence of simulated pulpal pressure (SPP) on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of four simplified luting strategies to indirect composite restorations. Dentin disks from 40 human molars were prepared and treated with 4 different techniques: (1) SB+ARC: two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive + conventional dual-curing resin cement (Adper Single Bond 2 + RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE); (2) ED+PAN: self-etching primer + conventional dual-curing resin cement (ED Primer + Panavia F2.0, Kuraray Medical); (3) S3+PAN: one-step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil S3, Kuraray) + Panavia F2.0; (4) U200: self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE). Pre-made indirect composite restorations (Filtek Z100, 3M ESPE) were luted onto the specimens. The luted specimens were cut into resin-dentin beams and the μTBS was tested after two different aging regimes: water storage at 37°C for one week (control) or three months under 20 cm H2O simulated pulpal pressure (SPP). The μTBS data was analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). SB+ARC showed significantly higher μTBS after both aging regimes (p < 0.001). The statistically significantly lowest μTBS was measured for control S3+PAN and U200 after 3 months SPP (p < 0.001). S3+PAN was the only group not negatively affected by SPP (p = 0.699). Two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives associated with dual-curing conventional resin cements may achieve the highest μTBS, even after 3 months of SPP. The one-step self-etching adhesive along with the dualcuring conventional resin cement was able to maintain bond stability.

MATERIALES
Referencia del producto
Marca
Descripción del producto

Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, BioReagent, suitable for electrophoresis, for molecular biology, ≥98.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, ≥99.0% (GC), dust-free pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium dodecyl sulfate solution, BioUltra, for molecular biology, 10% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium dodecyl sulfate solution, BioUltra, for molecular biology, 20% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium(IV) oxide, powder, 5 μm, 99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Alcohol etílico puro, 200 proof, anhydrous, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Camphorquinone, 97%
Supelco
Dodecilsulfatosódico, dust-free pellets, suitable for electrophoresis, for molecular biology, ≥99.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium(IV) oxide, nanopowder, <100 nm particle size (TEM)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, ACS reagent, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, ≥98.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Alcohol etílico puro, 190 proof, ACS spectrophotometric grade, 95.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, ReagentPlus®, ≥98.5% (GC)
Supelco
Ethanol solution, 10 % (v/v) in H2O, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, tested according to NF, mixture of sodium alkyl sulfates consisting mainly of sodium dodecyl sulfate
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium(IV) oxide, 99.99% trace metals basis (purity excludes ~2% HfO2)
Sigma-Aldrich
Tris(tert-butoxy)silanol, 99.999%
Sigma-Aldrich
Alcohol etílico puro, 190 proof, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium(IV) oxide, nanoparticles, dispersion, <100 nm particle size (BET), 10 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, BioXtra, ≥99.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, 92.5-100.5% based on total alkyl sulfate content basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium(IV) oxide, nanoparticles, dispersion, <100 nm particle size (BET), 5 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, ≥90% ((Assay))
Sigma-Aldrich
Dodecilsulfatosódico, BioReagent, suitable for electrophoresis, for molecular biology, ≥98.5% (GC), free-flowing, Redi-Dri