콘텐츠로 건너뛰기
Merck
  • The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in improving the sensitivity of LI-RADS classification of small hepatic observations suspected of malignancy.

The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in improving the sensitivity of LI-RADS classification of small hepatic observations suspected of malignancy.

Abdominal radiology (New York) (2019-01-04)
Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Rania Refaat, Faten Fawzy Mohammad, Mai E M Khamis, Ahmed Mohamed El-Maghraby, Ahmed A El Sammak, Rania M Al-Molla, Heba A E Mohamed, Ahmad Abdullah Alnaggar, Hanan Abdelhameed Hassan, Taghreed M Azmy, Ahmed M Alaa Eldin, Mostafa Mohamad Assy, Mohamad Zakarya AlAzzazy, Khaled Mohamed Altaher, Heba Fathy Tantawy, Sameh Saber, Mohamed I Amin, Ahmed Mohamed Alsowey, Mohamed Hesham Saleh Radwan, Heba F Taha, Talaat Fathy, Amr Shaaban Hanafy, Eman H Abdelbary
초록

We investigated the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the categorization of small hepatic observation (≤ 20 mm) detected in patients with chronic liver disease in reference to LI-RADS (liver imaging reporting and data system) classification system. We prospectively evaluated 165 patients with chronic liver disease with small hepatic observations (≤ 20 mm) which were previously categorized as LI-RADS grade 3-5 on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT). All patients were submitted to a functional MRI including DCE and DWI. Using LI-RADS v2017, two radiologists independently evaluated the observations and assigned a LI-RADS category to each observation using DCE-MRI alone and combined DCE-MRI and DWI/ADC. In the combined technique, the radiologists assigned a LI-RADS category based on a modified LI-RADS criteria in which restricted diffusion on DWI was considered a major feature of HCC. We evaluated the inter-reader agreement with Kappa statistics and compared the diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS with two imaging techniques by Fisher's exact test using histopathology as the reference standard. Combined technique in LI-RADS yielded better sensitivities (reader 1, 97% [65/67]; reader 2, 95.5% [64/67]) for HCC diagnosis than DCE-MRI alone (reader 1, 80.6% [54/67], p = 0.005; reader 2, 83.6% [56/67], p = 0.04). The specificities were insignificantly lower in combined technique (reader 1, 88.4% [107/121]; reader 2, 77.7% [94/121]) than in DCE-MRI alone (reader 1, 90.9% [110/121], p = 0.67; reader 2, 79.3% [96/121], p = 0.88). The inter-reader agreement of the LI-RADS scores between combined technique and DCE-MRI was good (κ = 0.765). The use of DWI/ADC as an additional major criterion, improved the sensitivity of LI-RADS in the diagnosis of HCC while keeping high specificity.