Skip to Content
Merck
  • Effects of a dietary antioxidant blend and vitamin E on growth performance, oxidative status, and meat quality in broiler chickens fed a diet high in oxidants.

Effects of a dietary antioxidant blend and vitamin E on growth performance, oxidative status, and meat quality in broiler chickens fed a diet high in oxidants.

Poultry science (2014-05-28)
T Lu, A F Harper, J Zhao, R A Dalloul
ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to determine the effects of a dietary antioxidant blend (AB) and vitamin E on performance, oxidative status, and meat quality. Cobb 500 male broilers (n = 1,200, d 0) were randomly distributed into 6 treatments with 10 replicate pens. Treatments included 1) HO: high oxidant diet, vitamin E at 10 IU/kg, 3% oxidized soybean oil, 3% polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) source; 2) VE: the HO diet with vitamin E at 200 IU/kg; 3) AOX: the HO diet with AB at 135 mg/kg; 4) VE+AOX: the HO diet with vitamin E at 200 IU/kg and AB at 135 mg/kg; 5) SC: standard control; and 6) PC: positive control, the SC diet with AB at 135 mg/kg. From d 0 through d 21, high oxidant diet treatment birds had greater BW, ADG, and ADFI than the SC birds; the AOX birds had better G:F on d 10 and 42, and from d 0 to 42 than SC birds (P < 0.05). The plasma TBA reactive substance level was lower in the AOX birds than the VE treatment birds in all phases (P < 0.05). High oxidant diet treatment birds had greater α-1-acid glycoprotein levels on d 10 than SC and PC birds (P < 0.05). The AOX, PC, and SC birds had a greater level of uric acid than the HO and VE+AOX birds on d 10. Superoxide dismutase expression in the liver was less with the HO treatment compared with the SC treatment on d 7 (P < 0.05). The vitamin E concentration in the breast muscle was greatest in the VE birds, whereas vitamin A concentration was greater in the PC birds compared with the SC birds on d 21 (P < 0.05). Compared with VE and AOX, the HO treatment had greater drip loss (P < 0.05). In conclusion, dietary addition of AOX was effective in improving growth, moderately restored the whole body antioxidant capability, and reduced drip loss.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

USP
Hypromellose, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Hypromellose, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, viscosity 80-120 cP, 2 % in H2O(20 °C)(lit.)
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, viscosity 40-60 cP, 2 % in H2O(20 °C)(lit.)
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, average Mn ~10,000
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, average Mn ~86,000
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, average Mn ~90,000
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, average Mn ~120,000
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose
Sigma-Aldrich
(Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose, viscosity 2,600-5,600 cP, 2 % in H2O(20 °C)(lit.)
Supelco
Propyl gallate, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Propyl gallate, for microscopy, ≥98.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Propyl gallate, antioxidant, ≥98.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Propyl gallate, powder
Supelco
Ethoxyquin, PESTANAL®, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Propyl gallate, ≥98%, FCC
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethoxyquin, ≥75% (capillary GC)
USP
Propyl gallate, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard