Skip to Content
Merck
  • Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.

Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.

The international journal of esthetic dentistry (2014-04-24)
Abdulaziz M Altamimi, Aris Petros Tripodakis, George Eliades, Hiroshi Hirayama
ABSTRACT

To compare the fracture resistance between bilayered zirconia/ fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate heat-pressed crowns and characterize the mode of fracture failure. Thirty crown samples were sequentially fitted on a mandibular right first molar metal replica of an ivory prepared molar tooth. The crown specimens were divided in three groups (A, B, and C; n = 10 for each group). Group A consisted of bilayered zirconia/fluorhapatite pressed-over crowns with standard design crown copings (0.7 mm uniform thickness), Group B of bilayered zirconia/fluorhapatite with anatomical design crown copings, and Group C of lithium disilicate monolithic crowns. The samples were then dynamically loaded under water for 100,000 cycles with a profile of 250 N maximum load at 1,000 N/s rate and 2.0 Hz frequency. Loading was performed with a steel ball (5 mm in diameter) coming into contact with the test crown, loading to maximum, holding for 0.2 s, unloading and lifting off 0.5 mm. The samples were then fractured under static loading, in order to determine the ultimate crown strength. Analysis of the recorded fracture load values was carried out with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey tests. Fractured specimens were examined by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The fracture loads measured were (N, means and standard deviations): Group A: 561.87 (72.63), Group B: 1,014.16 (70.18) and Group C: 1,360.63 (77.95). All mean differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Catastrophic fractures occurred in Group C, whereas mainly veneer fractures were observed in Groups A and B. In the present study, the heat-pressed monolithic lithium-disilicate crowns showed more fracture resistance than zirconia/fluorapatite pressed-over crowns. Within the bilayered groups, the anatomical zirconia coping design presented increased ceramic fracture resistance.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Supelco
Density Standard 998 kg/m3, H&D Fitzgerald Ltd. Quality
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, BioPerformance Certified
Supelco
Water, ACS reagent, for ultratrace analysis
Supelco
Water, for TOC analysis
Supelco
Water, suitable for ion chromatography
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, for cell biology, sterile ultrafiltered
Supelco
Water, for HPCE, for luminescence, suitable for UV/Vis spectroscopy
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium, powder, −100 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium, foil, thickness 0.1 mm, 99.98% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium, sponge, ≥99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, deuterium-depleted, ≤1 ppm (Deuterium oxide)
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium, rod, diam. 6.35 mm, ≥99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, for embryo transfer, sterile-filtered, BioXtra, suitable for mouse embryo cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
E-Toxate Water, endotoxin, free
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, PCR Reagent
Zirconium, foil, 15mm disks, thickness 0.025mm, annealed, 99.2%
Zirconium, foil, 50x50mm, thickness 0.25mm, annealed, 99.2%
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, for molecular biology, sterile filtered
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, Nuclease-Free Water, for Molecular Biology
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, Deionized
Sigma-Aldrich
Water, sterile-filtered, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Zirconium, foil, not light tested, 25x25mm, thickness 0.003mm, 99.2%
Zirconium, foil, light tested, 50x50mm, thickness 0.015mm, 99.2%
Zirconium, foil, light tested, 25x25mm, thickness 0.006mm, 99.2%
Zirconium, foil, 8mm disks, thickness 0.25mm, annealed, 99.2%
Zirconium, foil, 8mm disks, thickness 0.5mm, annealed, 99.2%
Zirconium, foil, 6mm disks, thickness 0.075mm, annealed, 99.2%
Zirconium, foil, light tested, 25x25mm, thickness 0.01mm, 99.2%