Skip to Content
Merck
  • The efficiency of conventional microscopic selection is comparable to the hyaluronic acid binding method in selecting spermatozoa for male infertility patients.

The efficiency of conventional microscopic selection is comparable to the hyaluronic acid binding method in selecting spermatozoa for male infertility patients.

Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology (2015-02-14)
Meng-Ting Huang, Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee, Chung-Hao Lu, Ying-Jie Chen, Sheng-Hsiang Li, Yuh-Ming Hwu
ABSTRACT

To evaluate if hyaluronic acid (HA)-bound spermatozoa surpassed conventional microscopy-selected spermatozoa in the status of sperm DNA integrity by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence staining. Spermatozoa obtained from couples with indication for the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedure due to male infertility (n = 34) and control males with normal sperm parameters (n = 12) were analyzed using AO fluorescence staining after density-gradient centrifugation (DGC), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-microscopic selection, and HA-binding selection to determine sperm DNA integrity. Percentages of DNA intact spermatozoa with green fluorescence were significantly higher in both PVP-microscopic selected spermatozoa (82.1 ± 24.0%) and HA-bound spermatozoa (83.9 ± 21.1%) than in spermatozoa prepared by DGC (66.8 ± 24.0%). However, there was no significant difference between the PVP-sperm and HA-sperm groups. When the percentage of green fluorescent spermatozoa prepared by DGC fell initially below 68%, both PVP-microscopic and HA-binding selection failed to select over 90% spermatozoa with intact DNA for ICSI in the male infertility group. Compared to control males with normal sperm parameters (99.3 ± 1.8%), the proportion of green fluorescence sperm after HA-binding selection from couples with male infertility (83.9 ± 21.1%) did not reach the range of > 99% reported by Yagci et al. The percentages of DNA intact spermatozoa between the PVP-sperm and HA-sperm groups were not significantly different. In an ICSI procedure, a well-trained embryologist will have the same ability to choose sperm with intact DNA by conventional microscopic selection as with HA-bound spermatozoa selection.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Supelco
Acetic acid, analytical standard
Supelco
Methanol, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acridine Orange hydrochloride solution, 10 mg/mL in H2O, ≥95.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid-12C2, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, NMR reference standard
SAFC
Acetic acid, glacial
Supelco
Methanol, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, ACS reagent, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, Absolute - Acetone free
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, ACS spectrophotometric grade, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, BioReagent, ≥99.93%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid solution, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, suitable for HPLC, gradient grade, suitable as ACS-grade LC reagent, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, HPLC Plus, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, Laboratory Reagent, ≥99.6%
Supelco
Citric acid, Anhydrous, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Millipore
Bifido Selective Supplement B, suitable for microbiology
Supelco
5α-Androstan-17β-ol-3-one, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol-12C, 99.95 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol solution, NMR reference standard, 4% in methanol-d4 (99.8 atom % D), NMR tube size 3 mm × 8 in.