Skip to Content
Merck
  • A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment.

A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment.

Clinical oral investigations (2015-03-25)
Mustafa Demirci, Safa Tuncer, Evren Öztaş, Neslihan Tekçe, Ömer Uysal
ABSTRACT

To evaluate the medium-term clinical performance of direct composite build-ups for diastema closures and teeth recontouring using a nano and a nanohybrid composite in combination with three- or two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives following treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. A total of 30 patients (mean age, 19.5 years) received 147 direct composite additions for teeth recontouring and diastema closures. A nano and a nanohybrid composite (Filtek Supreme XT and CeramX Duo) were bonded to tooth structure by using a three-step (Scotchbond Multipurpose) or a two-step (XP Bond) etch and rinse adhesive. Ten out of 147 composite build-ups (composite addition) constituted tooth recontouring cases, and the remaining 137 constituted diastema closure cases. The restorations were evaluated by two experienced, calibrated examiners according to modified Ryge criteria at the following time intervals: baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years. The 4-year survival rates were 92.8 % for Filtek Supreme XT/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus and 93 % for CeramX Duo/XP Bond. Only ten restorations failed (5 Filtek Supreme XT and 5 CeramX Duo). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the two composite-adhesive combinations with respect to color match, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, caries formation, marginal adaptation, and surface texture on comparing the five time periods (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years) The 4-year survival rates in the present study were favorable. The restorations exhibited excellent scores with regard to color match, marginal adaptation, surface texture, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, and caries formation, after 4 years of clinical evaluation. Clinical relevance An alternative clinical approach for correcting discrepancies in tooth size and form, such as performing direct composite restorations following fixed orthodontic treatment, may be an excellent and minimally invasive treatment.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid solution, NMR reference standard, 85% in D2O (99.9 atom % D), NMR tube size 3 mm × 8 in.
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid solution, NMR reference standard, 85% in D2O (99.9 atom % D), NMR tube size 5 mm × 8 in.
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid solution, 85 wt. % in H2O, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid solution, NMR reference standard, 85% in D2O (99.9 atom % D), NMR tube size 4.2 mm × 8 in. , WGS-5BL Coaxial NMR tube
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid, ACS reagent, ≥85 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid-16O4 solution, 70 wt. % in D2O, 99.9 atom % 16O
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid, crystalline, ≥99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid, 85 wt. % in H2O, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid, ≥85 wt. % in H2O, ≥99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid, BioUltra, ≥85% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid, BioReagent, suitable for insect cell culture, 85%
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphoric acid, ACS reagent, ≥85 wt. % in H2O