Ultrapure Water for Metal Analysis in Regulated Food & Beverage Labs

Merina Corpinot (PhD)¹, Lionel Lumet³, Estelle Riche (PhD)², Gabriela Dima (PhD)¹, Jean-Christophe Royer²

¹R&D, Lab Water Solutions, Merck, Guyancourt, France, ²Strategic Marketing, Lab Water Solutions, Merck, Guyancourt, France, ³Environmental and Food and Beverage Testing Laboratory of Vendée, La-Roche-sur-Yon, France

Section Overview

• Elemental analysis of food and water samples
• Study: Quality control of food and bottled drinking water using Milli-Q^® ultrapure water 
• Analysis of elements in food samples
• Analysis of elements in bottled drinking water samples
• Conclusion: Role of ultrapure water in accurate multi-elemental analysis
• Related Products

Multi-elemental analysis, including ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry) and ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy), is one of the most common analytical methods used to monitor environmental contamination and control food quality in order to assess health risk. Specific methodologies have been developed to reliably separate and detect regulated (and non-regulated) elements in food and water samples, in one single analytical run.

Elemental analysis of food and water samples

Health risks of elements in food and water

Environmental concentrations of elements are continuously increasing due to agricultural, industrial and other human activities. Studies reveal that some metals (e.g., As, Cd, Hg and Pb) show toxicity (such as neurological, cardiovascular, dermatological, hepatic, nephrotic, immunological and reproductive), while others provide nutritional benefits (Cu, Co, Fe, K, Mn, Zn).^1,2 The health risks related to toxic metals depend on their concentration and the length of exposure. Several parts of the world are impacted by drinking water³ and food contamination.⁴ For this reason, regulations are evolving to allow the effective and standardized measurement of these toxic chemicals.

Regulation of elemental contamination in food and water

Maximum levels of elemental contaminants in foodstuffs and drinking water have been established to protect human health and the environment. Multi-elemental analyses help to achieve compliance with local, national and international guidelines. Standards for the quality of water are set by the World Health Organization (WHO)⁵ and regulations are implemented by individual countries.

In Europe and in the US, the EU Drinking Water Directive⁶ and the US Safe Drinking Water Act (Environment Protection Agency),⁷ respectively, establish standards to ensure the quality of tap water and set methods to monitor levels of contaminants.

With respect to food products, the EU Commission’s Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006^8,9 used to set acceptable levels for Cd, Hg, Pb and inorganic Sn. The US FDA gives guidelines to industry for As and Pb,¹⁰ and, in 2021, the FDA started the Closer to Zero program to target a larger range of metals. The goal of this program is to reduce dietary exposure to contaminants to as low as possible, while maintaining access to nutritious foods, especially for babies and young children.

Requirement for high-purity water in testing labs

To respond to customer requirements, it is important for testing laboratories to use high-purity water to ensure precision and accuracy when measuring these critical elements. Water is used at each step of analyses done by ICP-OES or ICP-MS, including:

• As a reagent blank
• For sample and standard preparation
• For instrument and sample container cleaning

Laboratories must be confident in the high quality and the consistency of their purified water, as water contaminants can impede optimal instrument functioning, cause interferences, and impact results reliability.

Study: Quality control of food and bottled drinking water using Milli-Q^® ultrapure water

We assessed the use of ultrapure water delivered from a Milli-Q^® IQ 7000 water purification system for the multi-elemental analysis of various food and bottled drinking water samples. We chose food samples (tuna, rice, apple sauce, red meat and oysters) that are often suspected to be contaminated with toxic metals. Bottled drinking water samples were chosen knowing that water analysis is submitted to regulations. Quality control was performed according to EU regulations.^8,9

Analytical methods and materials

Regulated elements

To evaluate compliance with EU requirements for toxic elements (Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, Sn), validated methods were used to analyze food samples commonly tested by food and environmental testing laboratories. Although no regulatory limits are set for other heavy metals at the European level, France regulatory bodies set notification levels for certain metals (Al, Co, Cr, Ni, Se, Zn) to control food safety and quality (such as contamination, authenticity and traceability of products).

ICP-MS analysis & instrument parameters

Analyses were performed by the accredited Environmental and Food and Beverage Testing Laboratory in Vendée, France.¹¹ The laboratory performed multi-elemental analyses of food and bottled drinking water samples using ICP-MS. Each sample was analyzed three times, and the results were expressed as means, standard deviations and relative standard deviations.

• Food samples were analyzed according to the French government initiative, the ANSES/LSAliments-LSA-0084 method of analysis for food safety¹² (for As, Cd, Hg and Pb) or an internal ICP-MS method (based on ANSES/LSAliments-LSA-0084 method for Al, Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, Se, Sn, Zn).
• Bottled drinking water samples were analyzed following two different methods. Method 1 was based on Directive 2020/2184⁶ regarding the quality of water intended for human consumption. The limits of detection (LOD, the lowest concentration that can be reliably detected using an analytical method) were evaluated and calculated according to the NF EN 17294-1-2004 norm.¹³ The limits of quantification (LOQ, the minimum concentration of the element that can be accurately measured using an analytical method) were set according to the decision of the 19/10/2017 decree¹⁴ and validated in the matrix according to the NF T 90-210 norm. Method 2, deriving from the NF EN 17294-1-2016 norm,¹⁵ was developed by the laboratory to analyze low levels of elements in water samples.

ICP-MS instrument parameters (Table 1) were selected to achieve a high level of sensitivity, reliability, accuracy and precision.

 

Table 1. ICP-MS instrument parameters (sample introduction and settings) used for multi-elemental analysis of food and bottled drinking water samples.

Parameter	Food samples	Drinking water samples
Instrument	Aurora Elite, Analytik Jena®	PlasmaQuant®, Analytik Jena
Analysis mode	Standards additions	Quantitative
Number of replicates	3	3
Number of scans	30	30
CRI (mL/min)	One run H2 90 (Se) He 130 (Al, Cr, Co, Ni, Zn, As, Cd, Sn, Hg, Pb)	One run H2 120 He 130 No gas
Plasma power (kW)	1.45	1.40
Plasma gas flow (L/min)	16.50	10.50
Auxiliary gas flow (L/min)	1.95	1.50
Nebulizer gas flow (L/min)	0.98	1.01

Chemicals & water source

Ultrapure water [18.2 MΩ.cm, total organic carbon (TOC) < 5 µg/L] delivered from a Milli-Q^® IQ 7000 water purification system was used to prepare the samples and calibration solutions as described in the above-mentioned regulatory standards. The water system was equipped with a Millipak^® filter at the point of dispense, which contains a 0.22 µm membrane filter to ensure removal of particles and bacteria. Ultrapure nitric acid was obtained by distillation. Standard solutions were purchased from Tech Lab.

Calibration solutions

Solutions for calibration were prepared from stock solutions by dilutions using freshly dispensed Milli-Q^® ultrapure water and ultrapure nitric acid. These calibration solutions were used to make calibration curves and assess the linearity of the study range of the method.

Linear calibration curves were obtained

Figure 1. Examples of ICP-MS calibration curves for Pb, Cd, As and Cr used for the analysis of bottled drinking water samples.

 

The calibration range and LOQ for each element were established based on each element’s maximum levels set by EU regulatory bodies.^6,8 At least five standard concentrations were used for each element. Examples of calibration curves for Pb, Cd, As and Cr in the context of the analysis of foodstuffs and drinking water samples are shown in Figure 1.

For the analysis of foodstuffs, the linearity of each standard curve was close to 1 for the tested elements. The LOD values ranged from 0.0002 to 0.004 mg/kg. The LOQ values ranged from 0.005 to 0.25 mg/kg.

For the analysis of water samples, the linearity of each standard curve was close to 1 for the tested elements.The LOD values ranged from 0.004 µg/L to 32 µg/L. The LOQ values ranged from 0.01 µg/L to 1000 µg/L.

High-purity water of consistent quality contributed to obtaining linear calibration curves. Preparing calibration standards and diluting samples with high-quality water ensures that only the elements analyzed are the ones intentionally added in the standard solutions, preventing elemental contamination that can lead to inaccurate results and errors in the calibration process. Overall, linear calibration curves help researchers to obtain more accurate and reliable results with greater sensitivity (lower detection limits).

Analysis of elements in food samples

Table 2 presents the quantitative elemental results for the food samples tested and the LODs for each element. All samples were found to be compliant with the regulations set by the French legislation. The study found that arsenic and mercury levels in food can vary widely from brand to brand, and be higher in organic than in conventional food, likely due to the cultivation environment. It is important to note that this study does not permit broad generalizations about food quality (because of limited representative sampling, limited random sampling, etc.); rather, its aim is to highlight the role of water in the performance of the analysis of elements.

To enable a comprehensive analysis of the elements of interest, it is crucial to minimize contaminant levels in the water used to perform the analysis. Our findings illustrate that the ultrapure water used in the analytical process facilitated our ability to reach low LODs and yield reliable outcomes.

Table 2. Levels of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb, Se, Sn and Zn in various food samples. The LOD values were evaluated and calculated according to the NF EN 13804 norm.¹⁶ Regulated elements are in highlighted rows and bolded.

Element	Isotope number	Brand A tuna (mg/kg)	Brand B tuna (mg/kg)	Whole rice (mg/kg)	Organic whole rice (mg/kg)	Apple sauce (mg/kg)	Organic apple sauce (mg/kg)	Bovine meat (mg/kg)	Oysters (mg/kg)	LOD (mg/kg)
Al	27	0.67	2.5	1.2	2.2	0.39	1.6	1.2	9.9	0.005
As	75	0.51	1.0	0.19	0.24	< 0.010	< 0.010	< 0.010	6.3	0.002
Cd	111	0.042	0.006	0.033	0.032	< 0.003	< 0.003	< 0.005	0.36	0.0002
Co	59	< 0.005	< 0.005	0.011	0.025	< 0.005	< 0.005	< 0.005	0.039	0.0005
Cr	52	< 0.010	0.015	0.046	0.046	0.013	0.031	< 0.010	0.049	0.001
Hg	202	0.13	0.033	0.007	0.005	< 0.005	< 0.005	< 0.005	0.050	0.001
Ni	60	< 0.025	< 0.025	0.43	0.46	< 0.025	< 0.025	< 0.025	0.16	0.004
Pb	208	< 0.005	< 0.005	0.003	0.006	< 0.003	< 0.003	< 0.005	0.15	0.0007
Se	78	0.84	0.75	0.031	0.028	< 0.010	< 0.010	0.11	0.72	0.0008
Sn	118	< 0.025	0.088	< 0.013	< 0.013	< 0.025	<0.025	< 0.025	< 0.025	0.004
Zn	66	6.4	5.3	18	20	0.17	0.19	28	370	0.004

Analysis of elements in bottled drinking water samples

Similarly, samples from two different bottled water brands were analyzed to quantitative levels of regulated and non-regulated elements according to EU regulations⁶ (Table 3). All concentrations of elements of concern, such as Pb, were below the WHO recommendations.

Leveraging a more sensitive method (i.e., ‘Method 2’, last column of Table 3), we further demonstrated that the levels of elements in Milli-Q^® ultrapure water align with or even fall below the LODs calculated for the established method, Method 1. These results confirm the suitability of Milli-Q^® ultrapure water for conducting sensitive analyses.

Table 3. Levels of elements present in two brands of bottled drinking water and in samples of Milli-Q^® ultrapure water dispensed from a Milli-Q^® IQ 7000 ultrapure water system. *Method 1: Analyzed according to Directive 2020/2184⁶ which describes the quality of water intended for human consumption. ^†Evaluated and calculated according to the NF EN 17294-1-2004 norm.^{13 ‡}Set according to the decision of 19/10/2017¹⁴ and validated in the matrix according to the NF T 90-210 norm.^{17 £}Method 2: Low concentration level method developed by the laboratory and based on NF EN 17294-1-2016. Only the LOD values are reported for this method.¹⁵

Element	Isotope number	LOD† (µg/L)	LOQ‡ (µg/L)	Brand A bottled drinking water* (µg/L)	Brand B bottled drinking water* (µg/L)	Milli-Q® ultrapure water* (µg/L)	Milli-Q® ultrapure water (Method 2£) (µg/L)
Ag	107	0.008	0.5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010
Al	27	0.091	10.0	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.050
As	75	0.044	0.5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010
B	11	0.058	40.0	< LOQ	96	< LOQ	< 0.020
Ba	138	0.025	10.0	112	24	< LOQ	< 0.010
Be	9	0.007	0.5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.005
Ca	40	32	1 000	77 300	220 000	< LOQ	< 1.0
Cd	111	0.004	0.5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.005
Co	59	0.005	0.5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.005
Cr	52	0.018	0.5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010
Cu	63	0.067	5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010
Fe	56	0.3	10.0	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 1.0
Gd	157	0.003	0.010	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.005
K	39	19	1 000	< LOQ	2 090	< LOQ	< 0.005
Mg	24	10	1 000	25 900	37 400	< LOQ	< 1.0
Mn	55	0.066	5.0	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 1.0
Hg	202	0.004	0.015	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010
Mo	95	0.004	1.0	< LOQ	4.0	< LOQ	< 0.005
Na	23	16	1 000	7 010	4 540	< LOQ	< 1.0
Ni	60	0.005	5.0	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010
Pb	208	0.006	0.5	< LOQ	1.1	< LOQ	< 0.005
Sb	121	0.005	0.5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.005
Se	78	0.008	0.5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.030
Sn	118	0.004	5.0	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.005
Sm	147	0.003	0.010	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010
Tb	159	0.003	0.010	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.005
Ti	47	0.011	1.0	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010
Tl	205	0.004	0.5	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.005
U	238	0.004	0.5	1.9	0.9	< LOQ	< 0.005
V	51	0.016	1.0	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010
Zn	66	0.076	10	< LOQ	< LOQ	< LOQ	< 0.010

Conclusion: Role of ultrapure water in accurate multi-elemental analysis

When performing multi-elemental analysis, such as ICP-MS or ICP-OES, it is critical to use ultrapure water that is free of the elements being analyzed. The absence of metals and other impurities in Milli-Q^® ultrapure water is necessary, as they can influence blanks, standards and sample preparation, instrument cleaning and cause interferences during analysis.

This investigation allowed to establish the suitability of Milli-Q^® ultrapure water for the elemental analysis of food products and drinking water, essential for ensuring consumer health and product quality. Milli-Q^® ultrapure water systems facilitate the daily operations of testing laboratories operating within standardized environments, ensuring consistent water quality for reliable, reproducible, and repeatable analytical results. Furthermore, the water purification systems uphold data traceability, a critical aspect for laboratories subjected to audits.

A range of water purification solutions are available tailored to meet the needs of scientists working with in environmental and food and beverage testing laboratories.

Select and configure your optimal water purification system for your sensitive multi-elemental analyses or request support from a lab water expert. 

References

1. Zhao F, Tang Z, Song J, Huang X, Wang P. 2022. Toxic metals and metalloids: Uptake, transport, detoxification, phytoremediation, and crop improvement for safer food. Molecular Plant. 15(1):27-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2021.09.016

2. Elango D, Devi KD, Jeyabalakrishnan HK, Rajendran K, Thoomatti Haridass VK, Dharmaraj D, Charuchandran CV, Wang W, Fakude M, Mishra R, et al. 2022. Agronomic, breeding, and biotechnological interventions to mitigate heavy metal toxicity problems in agriculture. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 10100374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100374

3. Levin R, Villanueva CM, Beene D, Cradock AL, Donat-Vargas C, Lewis J, Martinez-Morata I, Minovi D, Nigra AE, Olson ED, et al. 2024. US drinking water quality: exposure risk profiles for seven legacy and emerging contaminants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 34(1):3-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00597-z

4. Onyeaka H, Ghosh S, Obileke K, Miri T, Odeyemi OA, Nwaiwu O, Tamasiga P. 2024. Preventing chemical contaminants in food: Challenges and prospects for safe and sustainable food production. Food Control. 155110040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110040

5. World Health Organization (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edition incorporating first addendum. 4th ed + 1. . Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/254637

6. Directive (EU) 2020/2184 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Union (2020). [Last accessed 24 Sep 2024]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2020/2184/oj

7. Summary of the Safe Drinking Water Act. US EPA. [Last accessed 24 Sep 2024]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-safe-drinking-water-act

8. Regulation PM. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs (Text with EEA relevance). No longer in force, Date of end of validity: 24/05/2023; Repealed by 32023R0915. Latest conso. 2023;24(1881):5–24.

9. Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1006 of 25 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of inorganic arsenic in foodstuffs (Text with EEA relevance). [Last accessed 24 Sep 2024]. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/1006/oj

10. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Chemical Contaminants, Metals, Natural Toxins & Pesticides Guidance Documents & Regulations. Guidance documents contain nonbinding recommendations. [Last accessed 24 Sep 2024]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ChemicalContaminantsMetalsNaturalToxinsPesticides/default.htm

11. Laboratoire de l’environnement et de l’alimentation de Vendée. (LEAV, accreditation COFRAC testing, N°1-1064, scope available on www.cofrac.fr). Available from: https://laboratoire.vendee.fr/

12. ANSES. ANSES/LSAliments/LSA-INS-0084 - V 06 Mai 2018 : Détermination de la teneur en arsenic, cadmium, plomb et mercure dans les denrées alimentaires d’origine animale Dosage par spectrométrie de masse couplée à un plasma induit (ICP-MS) après digestion (acide). Available from: https://www.anses.fr/fr/content/détermination-de-la-teneur-en-plomb-cadmium-mercure-arsenic-étain-et-cuivre-dans-les-denrées

13. ISO 17294-1:2004. Water quality — Application of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) — Part 1: General guidelines. [Last accessed 24 Sep 2024]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/32957.html

14. Arrêté du 19 octobre 2017 relatif aux méthodes d’analyse utilisées dans le cadre du contrôle sanitaire des eaux. Légifrance. [Last accessed 24 Sep 2024]. Available from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000035879856/

15. ISO 17294-2:2016. Water quality — Application of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) — Part 2: Determination of selected elements including uranium isotopes. [Last accessed 24 Sep 2024]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/62962.html

16. EN 13804:2013 - Foodstuffs - Determination of elements and their chemical species - General. [Last accessed 24 Sep 2024]. Available from: https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-en-13804-2013-foodstuffs-determination-of-elements-and-their-chemical-species-general-considerations-and-specific-requirements/?srsltid=AfmBOoqAArBUTzz9UJsEqD4_U4H_x-kxq5GN8_p9aScLuYhRqV6Y21Cc

17. NF T90-210:2018. Qualité de l’eau - Protocole d’évaluation initiale des performances d’une méthode dans un laboratoire. [Last accessed 24 Sep 2024]. Available from: https://www.boutique.afnor.org/fr-fr/norme/nf-t90210/qualite-de-leau-protocole-devaluation-initiale-des-performances-dune-method/fa190833/81632