Comparison of bismuth-containing quadruple and concomitant therapies as a first-line treatment option for Helicobacter pylori.

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with standard triple regimens are worsening, and alternative treatments are urgently needed in some populations. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of bismuth-based quadruple and concomitant regimens. Consecutive Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomized to receive one of two regimens: (i) bismuth subsalicylate 300 mg q.i.d., esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d., tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. (bismuth group) or (ii) esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d., tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. (concomitant group) for 14 days. Gastroscopy and 14C-urea breath test were performed before enrollment, and urea breath test was repeated six weeks after the treatment. A total of 200 patients were randomized, and 180 of them completed the protocols. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were 79% (95% confidence interval 71-87) and 89.7% (95% confidence interval 83-95) in the bismuth group and 74% (95% confidence interval 68-81) and 80.4% (95% confidence interval 72-87) in the concomitant group. The bismuth regimen achieved a slightly better eradication rate compared to the concomitant group in both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, but results were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Ten patients (6 in bismuth, 4 in concomitant groups) dropped out of the study because of side effects. The quadruple regimens with or without bismuth achieved moderate eradication rates as a first-line eradication option of Helicobacter pylori in our population, in which a bismuth-based regimen seems more appropriate. The compliance and side effects are important issues affecting the success of these regimens.