Accéder au contenu
MilliporeSigma

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host-disease--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leukemia research (2014-01-15)
Ron Ram, Moshe Yeshurun, Liat Vidal, Ofer Shpilberg, Anat Gafter-Gvili
RÉSUMÉ

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all trials comparing MMF and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis. Our search yielded 11 studies; 3 were randomized-control trials (RCTs). While the incidence of grades 2-4 acute GVHD was comparable, the incidence of grades 3 and 4 acute GVHD was higher in patients given MMF (RR 1.61; 95% CI 1.18-2.30). Incidence of mucositis was lower (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.25-0.49) and time to engraftment was shorter (mean difference (-3.6); 95% CI -5.5 to -1.7) in patients given MMF. All other analyzed transplantation outcomes were comparable. We conclude that MMF, compared to methotrexate, is associated with increased severity of acute GVHD. Robustness of these results is hampered by the small number of RCTs.

MATÉRIAUX
Référence du produit
Marque
Description du produit

Sigma-Aldrich
Méthotrexate hydrate, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Méthotrexate hydrate, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Méthotrexate hydrate, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Mycophenolate mofetil, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Méthotrexate hydrate, ≥99.0% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
USP
Mycophenolate mofetil, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Mycophenolate mofetil for peak identification, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Mycophenolate mofetil, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard