Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Identification of common horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.; Equisetaceae) using Thin Layer Chromatography versus DNA barcoding.

Identification of common horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.; Equisetaceae) using Thin Layer Chromatography versus DNA barcoding.

Scientific reports (2015-07-15)
C Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis, Sam Bruun-Lund, Natalie E Iwanycki, Ole Seberg, Gitte Petersen, Anna K Jäger, Nina Rønsted
ABSTRACT

The global herbal products market has grown in recent years, making regulation of these products paramount for public healthcare. For instance, the common horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) is used in numerous herbal products, but it can be adulterated with closely related species, especially E. palustre L. that can produce toxic alkaloids. As morphology-based identification is often difficult or impossible, the identification of processed material can be aided by molecular techniques. In this study, we explore two molecular identification techniques as methods of testing the purity of these products: a Thin Layer Chromatography approach (TLC-test) included in the European Pharmacopoeia and a DNA barcoding approach, used in recent years to identify material in herbal products. We test the potential of these methods for distinguishing and identifying these species using material from herbarium collections and commercial herbal products. We find that both methods can discriminate between the two species and positively identify E. arvense. The TLC-test is more cost- and time-efficient, but DNA barcoding is more powerful in determining the identity of adulterant species. Our study shows that, although DNA barcoding presents certain advantages, other established laboratory methods can perform as well or even better in confirming species' identity in herbal products.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid-12C2, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, NMR reference standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, HPLC Plus, ≥99.9%, poly-coated bottles
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroplatinic acid hydrate, 99.995% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroplatinic acid hydrate, ≥99.9% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroplatinic acid hydrate, ~38% Pt basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol solution, NMR reference standard, 4% in methanol-d4 (99.8 atom % D), NMR tube size 3 mm × 8 in.
Supelco
Dichloromethane solution, contains 10 % (v/v) methanol
Sigma-Aldrich
Toluene, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol solution, (Methanol:Dimethyl sulfoxide 1:1 (v/v))
Supelco
Methanol solution, contains 0.10 % (v/v) formic acid, UHPLC, suitable for mass spectrometry (MS), ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Diethylamine, puriss. p.a., ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Diethylamine, purified by redistillation, 99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Formic acid, ≥95%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol-12C, 99.95 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Quercetin 3-D-galactoside, ≥97.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, natural, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Diethylamine, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, anhydrous, ≥99.8%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Toluene, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeic acid, ≥98.0% (HPLC)