Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging.

Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging.

The International journal of prosthodontics (2013-03-12)
So-Yeun Kim, Myung-Joo Kim, Jung-Suk Han, In-Seong Yeo, Young-Jun Lim, Ho-Beom Kwon
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this investigation was to measure the accuracy of digital impressions (DIs) compared to conventional impressions (CIs). Using the iTero system, a master cast was scanned to produce stereolithography dies. As a control group, silicone impressions were taken and poured using stone. The resulting stereolithography and stone dies were scanned and overlayed on the scanned reference image of the master cast. The mean (± standard deviation) dimensional difference to the master cast was 23.9 (± 17.6) ?m for DIs and 17.6 (± 45.6) μm for CIs. The results indicate that DIs also provides enough accuracy for clinical application.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Drierite, with indicator, 10-20 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Drierite, with indicator, 6 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Drierite, without indicator, 8 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Drierite, with indicator, 8 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Drierite, with indicator, 4 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Drierite, without indicator, 4 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Calcium sulfate hemihydrate, purum, ≥97.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Calcium sulfate, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Calcium sulfate dihydrate, puriss., meets analytical specification of NF, E 516, 99.0-101.0% (based on anhydrous substance)
Sigma-Aldrich
Calcium sulfate dihydrate, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Calcium sulfate dihydrate, ACS reagent, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Calcium sulfate, −325 mesh, 99%